Sierra Acai Company
Sierra Acai Company
Open 7 Days a Week
MonaVie Independent Distributor
Distributor Training
Shop Online
Enroll Now
Buy Wholesale and maintain an Active status for 2 months and we will refund your $39 Distributor Fee
Friends
Buy Wholesale and maintain an Active status for 2 months and we will refund your $39 Distributor Fee
14-September-2008 12:50:22 - Belief For other uses, see Believe disambiguation. July 2007 Certainty series: Agnosticism Belief Certainty Determinism Estimation Fallibilism Epistemology Nihilism Probability Uncertainty This box: view talk Belief is the psychological state in which an individual holds a proposition or premise to be true. Contents 1 Belief, knowledge and epistemology 2 Belief as a psychological theory 3 Is belief voluntary? 4 Delusional beliefs 5 Limiting beliefs 6 Notes 7 See also 8 External links Belief, knowledge and epistemology The relationship between belief and knowledge is subtle. Believers in a claim typically say that they know that claim. For instance, those who believe that the Sun is a god will report that they know that the Sun is a god. However, the terms belief and knowledge are used differently by philosophers. Epistemology is the philosophical study of knowledge and belief. A primary problem for epistemology is exactly what is needed in order for us to have knowledge. In a notion derived from Plato's dialogue Theaetetus, philosophy has traditionally defined knowledge as justified true belief. The relationship between belief and knowledge is that a belief is knowledge if the belief is true, and if the believer has a justification reasonable and necessarily plausible assertions/evidence/guidance for believing it is true. A false belief is not considered to be knowledge, even if it is sincere. A sincere believer in the flat earth theory does not know that the Earth is flat. Similarly, a truth that nobody believes is not knowledge, because in order to be knowledge, there must be some person who knows it. Later epistemologists have questioned the justified true belief definition, and some philosophers have questioned whether belief is a useful notion at all. Belief as a psychological theory This section may contain original research or unverified claims. Please help by adding references. October 2007 Mainstream psychology and related disciplines have traditionally treated belief as if it were the simplest form of mental representation and therefore one of the building blocks of conscious thought. Philosophers have tended to be more rigorous in their analysis and much of the work examining the viability of the belief concept stems from philosophical analysis. The concept of belief presumes a subject the believer and an object of belief the proposition. So like other propositional attitudes, belief implies the existence of mental states and intentionality, both of which are hotly debated topics in the philosophy of mind and whose foundations and relation to brain states are still controversial. Beliefs are sometimes divided into core beliefs those which you may be actively thinking about and dispositional beliefs those which you may ascribe to but have never previously thought about. For example, if asked 'do you believe tigers wear pink pajamas ?' a person might answer that they do not, despite the fact they may never have thought about this situation before.1 That a belief is a mental state has been seen, by some, as contentious. While some philosophers have argued that beliefs are represented in the mind as sentence-like constructs others have gone as far as arguing that there is no consistent or coherent mental representation that underlies our common use of the belief concept and is therefore obsolete and should be rejected. This has important implications for understanding the neuropsychology and neuroscience of belief. If the concept of belief is incoherent or ultimately indefensible then any attempt to find the underlying neural processes which support it will fail. If the concept of belief does turn out to be useful, then this goal should in principle be achievable. Philosopher Lynne Rudder Baker has outlined four main contemporary approaches to belief in her book Saving Belief: Our common-sense understanding of belief is correct - Sometimes called the 'mental sentence theory', in this conception, beliefs exist as coherent entities and the way we talk about them in everyday life is a valid basis for scientific endeavour. Jerry Fodor is one of the principal defenders of this point of view. Our common-sense understanding of belief may not be entirely correct, but it is close enough to make some useful predictions - This view argues that we will eventually reject the idea of belief as we use it now, but that there may be a correlation between what we take to be a belief when someone says 'I believe that snow is white' and however a future theory of psychology will explain this behaviour. Most notably philosopher Stephen Stich has argued for this particular understanding of belief. Our common-sense understanding of belief is entirely wrong and will be completely superseded by a radically different theory which will have no use for the concept of belief as we know it - Known as eliminativism, this view, most notably proposed by Paul and Patricia Churchland, argues that the concept of belief is like obsolete theories of times past such as the four humours theory of medicine, or the phlogiston theory of combustion. In these cases science hasn't provided us with a more detailed account of these theories, but completely rejected them as valid scientific concepts to be replaced by entirely different accounts. The Churchlands argue that our common-sense concept of belief is similar, in that as we discover more about neuroscience and the brain, the inevitable conclusion will be to reject the belief hypothesis in its entirety. Our common-sense understanding of belief is entirely wrong, however treating people, animals and even computers as if they had beliefs, is often a successful strategy - The major proponents of this view, Daniel Dennett and Lynne Rudder Baker, are both eliminativists in that they believe that beliefs are not a scientifically valid concept, but they don't go as far as rejecting the concept of belief as a predictive device. Dennett gives the example of playing a computer at chess. While few people would agree that the computer held beliefs, treating the computer as if it did e.g. that the computer believes that taking the opposition's queen will give it a considerable advantage is likely to be a successful and predictive strategy. In this understanding of belief, named by Dennett the intentional stance, belief based explanations of mind and behaviour are at a different level of explanation and are not reducible to those based on fundamental neuroscience although both may be explanatory at their own level. Is belief voluntary? Most philosophers hold the view that belief formation is primarily spontaneous and involuntary. Many people only accept information supporting narrow and specific beliefs, rather than the more challenging broad study across cultures. Few are able to live without drawing many automatic conclusions, as the human mind seems to prefer certainty, even if it is most likely, in error. This occurs, most often, when people are forced to make either for or against choices, in a polarized world of so-called binary choices either/or. Belief is most often mandatory for group affiliation or official membership. In many cases, people bolster belief in which they are emotionally involved by attempted action to resolve contradictions experienced directly. This is done by creative rationializations to reduce experential dissonance. Human imagination serves as the catalyst for creating, modification and perpetuation of belief. Hope for a world different or better than the present world allows many people to hold information contradictory to their direct experience as valid. This phenomenon is known as dualism. People often believe merely what they wish to be true, in their mind, no matter how much it stands in direct opposition to experiential life. Belief, as a component of the human mind, is true speculation when assumptions cannot be verified logically reconciled to the external world. It is technically impossible for all variations of world belief, in over 6.6 Billion minds, to be simultaneously true. The observation of mutually exclusive belief variation, in various minds, clearly demonstrates the phenomena of diverging human imagination and personal modification. From an individual and/or group viewpoint, the preferred belief is strongly imagined to be the one and only unique truth, fostering an agenda with perceived rewards and very specific group requirements. Delusional beliefs Delusions are defined as beliefs in psychiatric diagnostic criteria for example in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Psychiatrist and historian G. E. Berrios has challenged the view that delusions are genuine beliefs and instead labels them as empty speech acts, where affected persons are motivated to express false or bizarre belief statements due to an underlying psychological disturbance. However, the majority of mental health professionals and researchers treat delusions as if they were genuine beliefs. In Lewis Carroll's Alice Through the Looking Glass, the White Queen says, Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast. This is often quoted in mockery of the common ability of people to entertain beliefs contrary to fact. Limiting beliefs The term limiting belief is used for a belief that inhibits exploration of a wider cognitive space than would otherwise be the case. Examples of limiting beliefs are seen both in animals and people. These may be strongly held beliefs, or held unconsciously, and are often tied in with self-image or perceptions about the world. Everyday examples of limiting beliefs: That one has specific capabilities, roles, or traits which cannot be escaped or changed. That one cannot succeed so there is no point committing to trying. That a particular opinion is right; therefore, there is no point considering other viewpoints. That a particular action or result is the only way to resolve a problem. Notes ^ Bell, V., Halligan, P.W. Ellis, H.D. 2006 A Cognitive Neuroscience of Belief. In P.W. Halligan M. Aylward eds The Power of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press. See also Charm Cognitive dissonance Collective belief Conversational intolerance Culture-specific syndrome Delusion Doxastic logic Evil eye Expectation Faith Folk psychology Gettier problem Idea Life stance Moore's paradox Nocebo Observer-expectancy effect Placebo Propositional attitude Propositional knowledge Psychosomatic illness Religion Self-deception Spell paranormal Spirituality Subject-expectancy effect Sugar pill Suggestibility Suggestion Subjective validation Truth Thomas theorem Ultimate importance Unintended consequence External links Look up belief in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Belief entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy by Eric Schwitzgebel Beliefnet - Belief-o-matic Compare Different Beliefs Information on different religions/beliefs Beliefs and Practices Belief refers to a part of a wider Spirituality Think without Beliefs Does rational thinking require the adherence to beliefs at all? Religious Beliefs Submit a belief and read about others' thoughts. Ethics of Belief Classic WK Clifford essay that belief by its nature is unethical, with counterpoint by William James v d e Philosophy Eastern philosophy · Western philosophy History Ancient Buddhist · Chinese · Greek · Hellenistic · Hindu · Indian · Jain · Persian Medieval Christian · Early Islamic · Islamic · Jewish · Judeo-Islamic Modern Empiricism · Rationalism Contemporary Analytic · Continental Lists Basic topics · Topic list · Philosophers · Philosophies · Glossary · Movements · more Branches Aesthetics · Ethics · Epistemology · Logic · Metaphysics Philosophy of Action · Education · Economics · Environment · Geography · Information · Healthcare · History · Human nature · Humor · Language · Law · Literature · Mathematics · Mind · Music · Being · Philosophy · Physics · Politics · Psychology · Religion · Science · Social science · Technology · War Schools Aristotelianism · Averroism · Avicennism · Critical Theory · Cynicism · Deconstructionism · Deontology · Dialectical materialism · Dualism · Epicureanism · Epiphenomenalism · Existentialism · Functionalism · Hedonism · Hegelianism · Hermeneutics · Humanism · Idealism · Kantianism · Liberalism · Logical positivism · Marxism · Materialism · Monism · Naturalism · Neoplatonism · New Philosophers · Nihilism · Ordinary language · Particularism · Peripatetic · Phenomenology · Platonism · Positivism · Postmodernism · Poststructuralism · Pragmatism · Presocratic · Realism · Relativism · Scholasticism · Skepticism · Stoicism · Structuralism · Thomism · Utilitarianism · Virtue ethics Portal · Category listings Retrieved from http://en..org/wiki/Belief Categories: Core issues in ethics | Epistemology | BeliefHidden categories: Articles needing additional references from July 2007 | Articles that may contain original research since October 2007 Views Article Discussion this page History Personal tools Log in / create account Navigation Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Search Go Search Interaction Community portal Recent changes Contact Donate to Help Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link Cite this page Languages العربية Català Deutsch Esperanto Eesti Español Français Hrvatski Interlingua Italiano עברית Magyar Bahasa Melayu Nederlands ‪Norsk nynorsk‬ 日本語 í•œêµì–´ Nouormand Polski Português РуÑ?Ñ?кий СрпÑ?ки / Srpski Simple English Suomi Svenska ไทย Türkçe УкраїнÑ?ька ייִדיש ä¸æ–‡ This page was last modified on 5 September 2008, at 15:11
39 Reasons to Drink Acai Juice Every Day
What is MonaVie - Watch the 8-minute video
Discovering MonaVie Video
The Power of You Video
Effects of MonaVie Active on Antioxidant Capacity in Humans
Log into your Wholesale MonaVie Account
So many of us do not eat a balanced diet, get enough sleep, have too much stress, or are impacted with toxins and pollutants. Drinking 2 ounces of MonaVie twice a day will help your body detoxify as well as build your immune system. Its the smartest thing you can do for yourself, so start today. Buying MonaVie through our company guarantees you support 7 days a week and, if you would like to share MonaVie with your family and friends we will guide you from start to finish.
1. Click on Enroll Now (30 - 55% off retail price)
2. Pay $39 for your Wholesale ID number.
3. NO minimum order required.
4. MonaVie is delivered to your door in 3 to 5 days.