Byzantine_Empire

News

News About Byzantine_Empire

14-September-2008 12:50:24 - Empire Byzantine redirects here. For other uses, see Byzantine disambiguation. Βασιλεία Ῥωμαίων Vasilía Roméon Imperium Romanum Roman Empire �? 330 - 1453 ↓ Flag Coat of arms Flag of the late Empire1 Imperial Emblem Palaiologoi2 Location of Byzantine Empire The Byzantine Empire during its greatest territorial extent under Justinian. c. 550. Capital Constantinople¹ Languages Latin until the 7th century, Greek thereafter Religion Greek Eastern Orthodox Christianity Government Monarchy Emperor - 306-337 Constantine the Great - 1449-1453 Constantine XI Legislature Byzantine Senate Historical era Middle Ages - Foundation of Constantinople² May 11, 330 - East-West Schism 1054 - Fall of Constantinople to the Fourth Crusade 1204 - Reconquest of Constantinople 1261 - Fall of Constantinople May 29, 1453 Population - 4th cent³ est. 34,000,000 - 8th cent 780 AD est. 7,000,000 - 11th cent³ 1025 AD est. 12,000,000 - 12th cent³ 1143 AD est. 10,000,000 - 13th cent 1281 AD est. 5,000,000 Currency Solidus, Hyperpyron Preceded by Succeeded by Roman Empire Empire of Trebizond Despotate of Morea Duchy of the Archipelago Lordship of Negroponte Kingdom of Cyprus Duchy of Athens ¹ Constantinople 330-1204 and 1261-1453. The capital of the Empire of Nicaea, the empire after the Fourth Crusade, was at Nicaea, present day İznik, Turkey. ² Establishment date traditionally considered to be the re-founding of Constantinople as a capital of the Roman Empire although other dates are often used ³ See Population of the Byzantine Empire for more detailed figures taken provided by Mcevedy and Jones, Atlas of world population history, 1978, as well as Angeliki E. Laiou, The Economic History of Byzantium, 2002. The Byzantine Empire3 and Eastern Roman Empire are recent names used to describe the Roman Empire during the Middle Ages, centered on its capital of Constantinople, referred to by its inhabitants simply as the Roman Empire in Greek Βασιλεία Ῥωμαίων or Romania Ῥωμανία, its emperors continuing the unbroken succession of Roman emperors, preserving Greco-Roman legal and cultural traditions; to the Islamic world it was known primarily as روم‎ Rûm Rome. Due to the linguistic, cultural, and demographic dominance of medieval Greek,4 it was known to many of its western European contemporaries as Empire of the Greeks see also the etymology section. As an outgrowth of the eastern portion of Empire founded in Rome, the Byzantine Empire's evolution into a separate culture from the West can be seen as a process beginning with Emperor Constantine's transferring the capital from Nicomedia in Anatolia to Byzantium, which was renamed Constantinople, on the Bosphorus. By the 7th century, under the reign of Emperor Heraclius, whose reforms changed the nature of the Empire's military and recognized Greek as the official language, the Empire had taken on a distinct new character. During its thousand-year existence the Empire suffered numerous setbacks and losses of territory but remained one of the most powerful economic, cultural and military forces in Europe. The empire's influence also spread into North Africa and the near East for much of the Middle Ages. After a final recovery under the Komnenian dynasty in the 12th century the Empire slipped into a long decline culminating in the capture of Constantinople and the remaining territories by the Ottoman Turks in the 15th century. The Empire, a bastion of Christianity and one of the prime trade centers in the world, helped to shield Western Europe from early Muslim expansion, provided a stable gold currency for the Merranean region, influenced the laws, political systems, and customs of much of Europe and the Middle East, and preserved much of the literary works and scientific knowledge of ancient Greece, Rome, and many other cultures. Contents 1 Etymology 2 Origin 2.1 The Tetrarchy 2.2 Constantine I and his successors 3 Early history 4 Justinian I and his successors 5 Heraclian dynasty and shrinking borders 6 Isaurian dynasty and Iconoclasm 7 Macedonian dynasty and resurgence 7.1 Internal developments 7.2 Wars against the Muslims 7.3 Wars against the Bulgarians 7.4 Triumph 8 Crisis and fragmentation 9 Komnenian dynasty and the crusaders 9.1 Alexios I and the First Crusade 9.2 John II, Manuel I and the Second Crusade 9.3 12th century Renaissance 10 Decline and disintegration 10.1 Dynasty of the Angeloi and Third Crusade 10.2 Fourth Crusade 11 Fall 11.1 Empire in exile 11.2 Reconquest of Constantinople 11.3 Rise of the Ottomans and fall of Constantinople 12 Aftermath 13 Culture 13.1 Economy 13.2 Science, Medicine, Law 13.3 Religion 13.4 Art and literature 13.5 Government and bureaucracy 13.6 Diplomacy 13.7 Language 13.8 Legacy 14 See also 15 References 16 Sources 16.1 Primary sources 16.2 Secondary sources 17 Further reading 18 External links 18.1 Byzantine studies, resources and bibliography 18.2 Miscellaneous Etymology For more details on this topic, see Names of the Greeks. Byzantine Empire Timeline 667 BC The ancient city of Byzantium the future Constantinople and future Istanbul is founded. 27 BC The rise of the Roman Empire. c. 235 - 284 The crisis of the 3rd century. 292 The reforms of Diocletian The Tetrarchy 330 Constantine makes Byzantium into his capital Nova Roma, which is renamed Constantinople The City of Constantine, sometime after Constantine's death in 337. It would remain the capital of the Byzantine Empire, with a half-century exception, for over a thousand years. 395 The Empire is permanently split into eastern and western halves, following on the death of Theodosius I. 527 Justinian I is crowned emperor. April 7, 529 The Codex Justinianus is promulgated. 532-537 The Emperor, Justinian, builds the church of Hagia Sophia 533-554 Justinian's generals reconquer North Africa and Italy from the Vandals and the Ostrogoths. 568 The Lombard invasion results in the loss of most of Italy. 634-641 The Arab armies conquer the Levant and Egypt. In the following decades, they take most of North Africa and later conquer Sicily as well. 697 The Byzantine city of Carthage in North Africa capital of the Exarchate of Africa falls to the Arab invasion. 730-787 and 813-843 The Iconoclasm controversies result in the loss of most of the Empire's remaining Italian territories, aside from some of the territories of the Mezzogiorno. 843-1025 The Macedonian dynasty is established and the Empire experiences a military and territorial revival. Byzantine scholars record and preserve many of the remaining ancient Greek and Roman texts. 960-1042 The Byzantine Empire deals a string of defeats upon the forces of the Abassid and Fatimid Caliphate, reconquering parts of Mesopotamia, Syria and Palestine. 1002-1018 The Emperor, Basil II, campaigns annually against the Bulgars, with the object of annihilating the Bulgar state. 1014 The Bulgarian army is completely defeated at the Battle of Kleidon Basil II becomes known as The Bulgar Slayer. 1018 Bulgaria surrenders and is annexed to the empire. The whole of the Balkans is incorporated into the Byzantine Empire, with the Danube as the new Imperial frontier to the north. 1025 With the death of Basil II, the zenith of the Empire's power is passed and the long decline of the Byzantine Empire begins. 1054 The Schism split between Church in Rome and the Church in Constantinople. 1071 The Emperor, Romanos IV, is defeated by the Seljuk Turks at the Battle of Manzikert, losing his position in most of Asia Minor. In the same year, the last Byzantine outpost in Italy Bari is conquered by the Normans. 1081 The Komnenos dynasty is established by Alexios I and Byzantium becomes involved in the Crusades. Economic prosperity generates new wealth; literature and the arts reach new heights. In Anatolia, the Turks become established. 1091 The Imperial armies defeat the Pechenegs at the Battle of Levounion. 1097 The recapture of Nicaea from the Turks by the Byzantine armies and the First Crusaders. 1097-1176 The Byzantine armies recapture the coasts of Asia Minor from the Turks, and push east towards central Anatolia. The Crusader Principality of Antioch becomes a Byzantine protectorate. 1122 The Byzantines defeat the Pechenegs at the Battle of Beroia. 1167 The Byzantine armies win a decisive victory over the Hungarians at the Battle of Sirmium and Hungary subsequently becomes a Byzantine client state. 1176 Byzantine-Seljuk Wars: Manuel I Komnenos is defeated at the Battle of Myriokephalon; attempts to capture Konya, the capital of the Seljuk Turks are abandoned after the destruction of his siege equipment. Within a year Manuel recovers the situation status quo ante bellum. 1180 With the death of the Emperor, Manuel I Komnenos, the decline of the Empire recommences. 1185 A successful rebellion is organized in Bulgaria and other lands are lost in the Balkans. 1204 Constantinople is conquered by Crusaders, attempting to establish a Latin Empire. 1261 Constantinople is reconquered by the Patriarch of Constantinople sponsored Emperor of Nicaea, Michael VIII Palaiologos, re-establishing Greek rule of a terminally diminished empire. 1326 The city of Prusa in Asia Minor falls to the Ottoman Turks. 1331 The city of Nicaea, capital of the Empire only 100 years previously, falls to the Ottoman Turks. 1453 The Ottoman Turks conquer Constantinople during the fourth crusade, and with the death of Constantine XI Palaiologos, the last emperor of the Byzantine Empire, the Byzantine Empire comes to an end, marking final destruction of the Roman Empire. The term Byzantine Empire is an invention of historians and was never used during the Empire's lifetime. The Empire's name in Greek was Basileia Rh�?mai�?n Greek: Βασιλεία Ῥωμαίων - The Empire of the Romans - a translation of the Latin name of the Roman Empire Latin: Imperium Roman�?rum; or just Rh�?mania Greek: Ῥωμανία. The term Byzantine itself comes from Byzantium, the name that the city of Constantinople had before it became the capital of Constantine. This older name of the city would rarely be used from this point onward except in historical or poetic contexts. The designation of the Empire as Byzantine began in Western Europe in 1557, when German historian Hieronymus Wolf published his work Corpus Historiæ By-zantinæ, a collection of Byzantine sources. The publication in 1648 of the Byzantine du Louvre Corpus Scriptorum Historiæ Byzantinæ, and in 1680 of Du Cange's Historia Byzantina further popularized the use of Byzantine among French authors, such as Montesquieu.5 It was not until the 19th century, however, with the birth of modern Greece, that the term Byzantine came into general use in the Western world. Before this, the Empire was described by Western Europeans as Imperium Graecorum Empire of the Greeks-Byzantine claims to Roman inheritance had been actively contested from at least the time of the coronation of Charlemagne as Imperator Augustus by Pope Leo III in 800. Whenever the Popes or the rulers of the West wanted to make use of the name Roman to refer to the Byzantine emperors, they preferred the term Imperator Romaniæ instead of Imperator Romanorum, a title that Westerners maintained applied only to Charlemagne and his successors.6 Origin See also: Late Antiquity The Tetrarchy Main articles: Tetrarchy and Diocletian Map of the Roman Empire ca. 395, showing the dioceses and praetorian prefectures of Gaul, Italy, Illyricum and Oriens east, roughly analogous to the four Tetrarchs' zones of influence after Diocletian's reforms. Map of the Roman Empire ca. 395, showing the dioceses and praetorian prefectures of Gaul, Italy, Illyricum and Oriens east, roughly analogous to the four Tetrarchs' zones of influence after Diocletian's reforms. During the 3rd century, three crises threatened the Roman Empire: external invasions, internal civil wars and an economy riddled with weaknesses and problems.7 The city of Rome gradually became less important as an administrative centre. The crisis of the 3rd century displayed the defects of the heterogeneous system of government that Augustus had established to administer his immense dominion. His successors had introduced some modifications, but events made it clearer that a new, more centralised and more uniform system was required.8 Diocletian was responsible for creating a new administrative system the tetrarchy.8 He associated himself with a co-emperor, or Augustus. Each Augustus was then to adopt a young colleague, or Caesar, to share in the rule and eventually to succeed the senior partner. After the abdication of Diocletian and Maximian, however, the tetrachy collapsed, and Constantine I replaced it with the dynastic principle of herary succession.9 Constantine I and his successors Main article: Constantine I The Baptism of Constantine painted by Raphael's pupils 1520-1524, fresco, Vatican City, Apostolic Palace. Eusebius of Caesaria records that, as was customary among Christian converts at the time, Constantine delayed receiving baptism until shortly before his death. The Baptism of Constantine painted by Raphael's pupils 1520-1524, fresco, Vatican City, Apostolic Palace. Eusebius of Caesaria records that, as was customary among Christian converts at the time, Constantine delayed receiving baptism until shortly before his death.10 Constantine moved the seat of the Empire, and introduced important changes into its civil and religious constitution.11 In 330, he founded Constantinople as a second Rome on the site of Byzantium, which was well-positioned astride the trade routes between East and West; it was a superb base from which to guard the Danube river, and was reasonably close to the Eastern frontiers. Constantine also began the building of the great fortified walls, which were expanded and rebuilt in subsequent ages. J. B. Bury asserts that the foundation of Constantinople ... inaugurated a permanent division between the Eastern and Western, the Greek and the Latin, halves of the Empire-a division to which events had already pointed-and affected decisively the whole subsequent history of Europe.8 Constantine built upon the administrative reforms introduced by Diocletian.12 He stabilized the coinage the gold solidus that he introduced became a highly prized and stable currency13, and made changes to the structure of the army. To divide administrative responsibilities, Constantine replaced the single praetorian prefect, who had traditionally exercised both military and civil functions, with regional prefects enjoying civil authority alone. In the course of the 4th century, four great sections emerged from these Constantinian beginnings, and the practice of separating civil from military authority persisted until the 7th century.14 Under Constantine, Christianity did not become the exclusive religion of the state, but enjoyed imperial preference, since the Emperor supported it with generous privileges: clerics were exempted from personal services and taxation, Christians were preferred for administrative posts, and bishops were entrusted with judicial responsibilities.15 Constantine established the principle that emperors should not settle questions of doctrine, but should summon general ecclesiastical councils for that purpose. The Synod of Arles was convened by Constantine, and the First Council of Nicaea showcased his claim to be head of the Church.16 The state of the Empire in 395 may be described in terms of the outcome of Constantine's work. The dynastic principle was established so firmly that the emperor who died in that year, Theodosius I, could bequeath the imperial office jointly to his sons: Arcadius in the East and Honorius in the West. Theodosius was the last emperor to rule over the full extent of the empire in both its halves.17 Early history Leo I of the Byzantine Empire 401-474, reigned 457-474. Leo I of the Byzantine Empire 401-474, reigned 457-474. The Eastern Empire was largely spared the difficulties faced by the West in the third and fourth centuries, due in part to a more firmly established urban culture and greater financial resources, which allowed it to placate invaders with tribute and pay foreign mercenaries. Throughout the fifth century, various invading armies overran the Western Empire but spared the east. Theodosius II further fortified the walls of Constantinople, leaving the city impenetrable to attacks; they were not breached until 1204. To fend off the Huns of Attila, Theodosius gave them subsidies purportedly 300 kg 700 lb of gold.18 Moreover, he favored merchants living in Constantinople who traded with the Huns and other foreign groups. His successor, Marcian, refused to continue to pay this exorbitant sum. However, Attila had already diverted his attention to the Western Roman Empire.19 After he died in 453, his empire collapsed and Constantinople initiated a profitable relationship with the remaining Huns, who would eventually fight as mercenaries in Byzantine armies.20 After the fall of Attila, the true chief in Constantinople was the Alan general Aspar. Leo I managed to free himself from the influence of the non-Orthodox chief by supporting the rise of the Isaurians, a semi-barbarian tribe living in southern Anatolia. Aspar and his son Ardabur were murdered in a riot in 471, and henceforth, Constantinople restored Orthodox leadership for centuries.21 Leo was also the first emperor to receive the crown not from a military leader, as was the Roman tradition, but from the Patriarch of Constantinople, representing the ecclesiastical hierarchy. This change became permanent, and in the Middle Ages the religious characteristic of the coronation completely supplanted the old military form. In 468, Leo unsuccessfully attempted to reconquer North Africa from the Vandals.22 By that time, the Western Roman Empire was restricted to Italy and the lands south of the Danube as far as the Balkans the Angles and Saxons had been invading and settling Britain since the early decades of the 5th century; the Visigoths and Suebi had possessed portions of Hispania since 417, and the Vandals had entered Africa in 429; Gaul was contested by the Franks under Clovis I, Burgundians, Bretons, Visigoths and some Roman remnants; and Theodoric was destined to rule in Italy until 52617. In 466, as a condition of his Isaurian alliance, Leo married his daughter Ariadne to the Isaurian Tarasicodissa, who took the name Zeno. When Leo died in 474, Zeno and Ariadne's younger son succeeded to the throne as Leo II, with Zeno as regent. When Leo II died later that year, Zeno became emperor. The end of the Western Empire is sometimes dated to 476, early in Zeno's reign, when the Germanic Roman general Odoacer deposed the titular Western Emperor Romulus Augustus, but declined to replace him with another puppet. Eastern Roman Empire, c. AD 480 Eastern Roman Empire, c. AD 480 To recover Italy, Zeno could only negotiate with the Ostrogoths of Theodoric, who had settled in Moesia. He sent the gothic king to Italy as magister militum per Italiam commander in chief for Italy. After the fall of Odoacer in 493, Theodoric, who had lived in Constantinople during his youth, ruled Italy on his own. Thus, by suggesting that Theodoric conquer Italy as his Ostrogothic kingdom, Zeno maintained at least a nominal supremacy in that western land while ridding the Eastern Empire of an unruly subordinate.17 In 475, Zeno was deposed by Basiliscus, the general who led Leo I's 468 invasion of North Africa, but he recovered the throne twenty months later. However, he faced a new threat from another Isaurian, Leontius, who was also elected rival emperor. In 491 Anastasius I, an aged civil officer of Roman origin, became emperor, but it was not until 498 that the forces of the new emperor effectively took the measure of Isaurian resistance.17 Anastasius revealed himself to be an energetic reformer and an able administrator. He perfected Constantine I's coinage system by definitively setting the weight of the copper follis, the coin used in most everyday transactions.23 He also reformed the tax system, and permanently abolished the hated chrysargyron tax. The State Treasury contained the enormous sum of 145,150 kg 320,000 lbs of gold when he died. Justinian I and his successors See also: Justinian I Justinian depicted on one of the famous mosaics of the Basilica of San Vitale, Ravenna. Justinian depicted on one of the famous mosaics of the Basilica of San Vitale, Ravenna. Justinian I, who assumed the throne in 527, oversaw a period of Byzantine expansion into former Roman territories. Justinian, the son of an Illyrian peasant, may already have exerted effective control during the reign of his uncle, Justin I 518-527.24 In 532, attempting to secure his eastern frontier, Justinian signed a peace treaty with Khosrau I of Persia agreeing to pay a large annual tribute to the Sassinids. In the same year, Justinian survived a revolt in Constantinople the Nika riots which ended with the death of allegedly thirty thousand rioters. This victory solidified Justinian's power.25 Pope Agapetus I was sent to Constantinople by the Ostrogoths king Theodahad, but failed in his mission to sign a peace with Justinian. However, he succeeded in having the Monophysite Patriarch Anthimus I of Constantinople denounced, despite Empress Theodora's support. The western conquests began in 533, as Justinian sent his general Belisarius to reclaim the former province of North Africa from the Vandals with a small army of about 15,000 men. Success came with surprising ease, but it was not until 548 that the major local independent tribes were subdued.25 In Ostrogothic Italy, the deaths of Theodoric the Great, his nephew and heir Athalaric, and his daughter Amalasuntha had left her murderer Theodahad on the throne despite his weakened authority. In 535, a small Byzantine expion sent to Sicily met with easy success, but the Goths soon stiffened their resistance, and victory did not come until 540, when Belisarius captured Ravenna, after successful sieges of Naples and Rome.26 Nevertheless, the Ostrogoths were soon reunited under the command of Totila and captured Rome on 17 December 546; Belisarius was eventually recalled by Justinian in early 549.27 The arrival of the Armenian eunuch Narses in Italy late 551 with an army of some 35,000 men marked another shift in Gothic fortunes. Totila was defeated and died at the Battle of Busta Gallorum. His successor, Teias, was likewise defeated at the Battle of Mons Lactarius October 552. Despite continuing resistance from a few Goth garrisons and two subsequent invasions by the Franks and Alamanni, the war for the Italian peninsula was at an end.28 In 551, a noble of Visigothic Hispania, Athanagild, sought Justinian's help in a rebellion against the king, and the emperor dispatched a force under Liberius, who, although elderly, proved himself a successful military commander. The Byzantine empire held on to a small slice of the Spania coast until the reign of Heraclius.29 Coat of arms of Greece Part of a series on the History of Greece Greek Bronze Age Helladic civilization Cycladic civilization Minoan civilization Mycenaean civilization Ancient Greece Greek Dark Ages Archaic Greece Classical Greece Hellenistic Greece Roman Greece Medieval Greece Byzantine Empire Ottoman Greece Modern Greece War of Independence Kingdom of Greece Axis occupation Civil War Military Junta Hellenic Republic By topic Art · Constitution · Economy Military · Names This box: view talk In the east, Roman-Persian Wars continued until 561 when Justinian's and Khusro's envoys agreed on a 50-year peace. By the mid-550s, Justinian had won victories in most theatres of operation, with the notable exception of the Balkans, which were subjected to repeated incursions from the Slavs. In 559, the Empire faced a great invasion of Kutrigurs and Sclaveni. Justinian called Belisarius out of retirement, but once the immediate danger was over, the emperor took charge himself. The news that Justinian was reinforcing his Danube fleet made the Kutrigurs anxious, and they agreed to a treaty which gave them a subsidy and safe passage back across the river.25 Theodora here with her retinue, mosaic from Basilica of San Vitale, Ravenna, Justinian's influential wife, was a former mime actress, whose earlier life is vividly described by Procopius in Secret History. Theodora here with her retinue, mosaic from Basilica of San Vitale, Ravenna, Justinian's influential wife, was a former mime actress, whose earlier life is vividly described by Procopius in Secret History.30 Justinian became universally famous because of his legislative work, remarkable for its sweeping character.31 In 529 a ten-man commission chaired by John the Cappadocian revised the ancient Roman legal code, creating the new Corpus Juris Civilis, a collection of laws that came to be referred to as Justinian's Code. In the Pandects, completed under Tribonian's direction in 533, order and system were found in the contradictory rulings of the great Roman jurists, and a textbook, the Institutiones, was issued to facilitate instruction in the law schools. The fourth book, the Novellae, consisted of collections of imperial edicts promulgated between 534 and 565. Because of his ecclesiastical policies, Justinian came into collision with the Jews, the pagans, and various Christian sects. The latter included the Manichaeans, the Nestorians, the Monophysites, and the Arians. In order to completely eradicate paganism, Justinian closed the famous philosophic school in Athens in 529.32 During the 6th century, the traditional Greco-Roman culture was still influential in the Eastern empire with prominent representatives such as the natural philosopher John Philoponus. Nevertheless, the Christian philosophy and culture were in the ascendant and began to dominate the older culture. Hymns written by Romanos the Melode marked the development of the Divine Liturgy, while architects and builders worked to complete the new Church of the Holy Wisdom, Hagia Sophia, designed to replace an older church destroyed in the course of the Nika revolt. Hagia Sophia stands today as one of the major monuments of architectural history.17 During the 6th and 7th centuries the Empire was struck by a series of epidemics, which would greatly devastate the population, contributing to a significant economic decline and weakening of the Empire.33 Justinian's successor, Justin II, refused to pay the large tribute to the Persians. Meanwhile, the Germanic Lombards invaded Italy; by the end of the century only a third of Italy was in Byzantine hands. Justin's successor, Tiberius II, choosing between his enemies, awarded subsidies to the Avars while taking military action against the Persians. Although Tiberius' general, Maurice, led an effective campaign on the eastern frontier, subsidies failed to restrain the Avars. They captured the Balkan fortress of Sirmium in 582, while the Turks began to make inroads across the Danube. Maurice, who in the meantime had become emperor, made peace with the Sassanian Emperor Khosrau II, achieving access to Armenia, and forced the Avars and Slavs back across the Danube by 602.17 Heraclian dynasty and shrinking borders Main article: Byzantium under the Heraclians See also: Heraclius, Roman-Persian Wars, and Byzantine-Arab Wars After Maurice's murder by Phocas, Khosrau used the pretext to reconquer the Roman province of Mesopotamia.34 Phocas, an unpopular ruler who is invariably described in Byzantine sources as a tyrant, was the target of a number of senate-led plots. He was eventually deposed in 610 by Heraclius, who sailed to Constantinople from Carthage with an icon affixed to the prow of his ship.35 Following the accession of Heraclius the Sassanid advance pushed deep into Asia Minor, also occupying Damascus and Jerusalem and removing the True Cross to Ctesiphon.36 The counter-offensive of Heraclius took on the character of a holy war, and an acheiropoietos image of Christ was carried as a military standard.37 Similarly, when Constantinople was saved from an Avar siege in 626, the victory was attributed to the icons of the Virgin which were led in procession by Patriarch Sergius about the walls of the city.38 The main Sassanid force was destroyed at Nineveh in 627, and in 629 Heraclius restored the True Cross to Jerusalem in a majestic ceremony.39 The war had exhausted both the Byzantine and Sassanid Empire, and left them extremely vulnerable to the Arab forces which emerged in the following years.40 The Byzantines suffered a crushing defeat at the Battle of Yarmuk in 636, and Ctesiphon fell in 634.41 Heraclius was the first emperor to replace the traditional Latin title for his office Augustus with the Greek Basileus Βασιλε�?ς.42 This shift from Latin to Greek finds a parallel in the contemporary abandonment of Latin in official documents.43 In an attempt to heal the doctrinal divide between Chalcedonian and monophysite Christians, Heraclius proposed monotheletism as a compromise. In 638 the new doctrine was posted in the narthex of Hagia Sophia as part of a text called the Ekthesis, which also forbade further discussion of the issue. By this time, however, Syria and Palestine, both hotbeds of monophysite belief, had fallen to the Arabs, and another monophysite center, Egypt, fell by 642. Ambivalence toward Byzantine rule on the part of monophysites may have lessened local resistance to the Arab expansion.44 Heraclius did succeed in establishing a dynasty, and his descendants held onto the throne, with some interruption, until 711. Their reigns were marked both by major external threats, from the west and the east, which reduced the territory of the empire to a fraction of its 6th-century extent, and by significant internal turmoil and cultural transformation. Byzantine Empire by 650; by this year it lost all of its southern provinces except the Exarchate of Carthage. Byzantine Empire by 650; by this year it lost all of its southern provinces except the Exarchate of Carthage. The Arabs, now firmly in control of Syria and the Levant, sent frequent raiding parties deep into Anatolia, and between 674 and 678 laid siege to Constantinople itself. The Arab fleet was finally repulsed through the use of Greek fire, and a thirty-years' truce was signed between the empire and caliphate.45 The Anatolian raids continued unabated, and accelerated the demise of classical urban culture, with the inhabitants of many cities either refortifying much smaller areas within the old city walls, or relocating entirely to nearby fortresses.46 The void left by the disappearance of the old semi-autonomous civic institutions was filled by the theme system, which entailed the division of Anatolia into provinces occupied by distinct armies which assumed civil authority and answered directly to the imperial administration. This system may have had its roots in certain ad hoc measures taken by Heraclius, but over the course of the seventh century it developed into an entirely new system of imperial governance.47 The Greek fire was first used by the Byzantine Navy during the Byzantine-Arab Wars from the Madrid Skylitzes, Biblioteca Nacional de España, Madrid. The Greek fire was first used by the Byzantine Navy during the Byzantine-Arab Wars from the Madrid Skylitzes, Biblioteca Nacional de España, Madrid. The withdrawal of massive amounts of troops from the Balkans to combat the Persians and then the Arabs in the east opened the door for the gradual southward expansion of Slavic peoples into the peninsula, and, as in Anatolia, many cities shrank to small fortified settlements.48 In the 670s the Bulgars were pushed south of the Danube by the arrival of the Khazars, and in 680 Byzantine forces which had been sent to disperse these new settlements were defeated. In the next year Constantine IV signed a treaty with the Bulgar khan Asparukh, and the new Bulgarian state assumed sovereignty over a number of Slavic tribes which had previously, at least in name, recognized Byzantine rule.49 In 687-688, emperor Justinian II led an expion against the Slavs and Bulgars which made significant gains, although the fact that he had to fight his way from Thrace to Macedonia demonstrates the degree to which Byzantine power in the north Balkans had declined.50 The one Byzantine city that remained relatively unaffected, despite a significant drop in population and at least two outbreaks of the plague, was Constantinople.51 However, the imperial capital was marked by its own variety of conflict, both political and religious. Constans II continued the monothelete policy of his grandfather, Heraclius, meeting with significant opposition from laity and clergy alike. The most vocal opponents, Maximus the Confessor and Pope Martin I were arrested, brought to Constantinople, tried, tortured, and exiled.52 Constans seems to have become immensely unpopular in the capital, and moved his residence to Syracuse, Sicily, where he was ultimately murdered by a member of his court.53 The Senate experienced a revival in importance in the seventh century and clashed with the emperors on numerous occasions.54 The final Heraclian emperor, Justinian II, attempted to break the power of the urban aristocracy through severe taxation and the appointment of outsiders to administrative posts. He was driven from power in 695, and took shelter first with the Khazars and then with the Bulgars. In 705 he returned to Constantinople with the armies of the Bulgar khan Tervel, retook the throne, and instituted a reign of terror against his enemies. With his final overthrow in 711, supported once more by the urban aristocracy, the Heraclian dynasty came to an end.55 The 7th century was a period of radical transformation. The empire which had once stretched from Spain to Jerusalem was now reduced to Anatolia, Chersonesos, and some fragments of Italy and the Balkans. The territorial losses were accompanied by a cultural shift; urban civilization was massively disrupted, classical literary genres were abandoned in favor of theological treatises,56 and a new radically abstract style emerged in the visual arts.57 That the empire survived this period at all is somewhat surprising, especially given the total collapse of the Sassanid Empire in the face of the Arab expansion, but a remarkably coherent military reorganization helped to withstand the exterior pressures and laid the groundwork for the gains of the following dynasty.58 Isaurian dynasty and Iconoclasm The Byzantine Empire at the accession of Leo III, c. 717. Striped land shows land raided by the Arabs. Click on the image for names of provinces The Byzantine Empire at the accession of Leo III, c. 717. Striped land shows land raided by the Arabs. Click on the image for names of provinces See also: Iconoclasm Byzantine Leo III the Isaurian turned back the Muslim assault in 718, and achieved a major victory at the expense of the Arabs in 740. He also addressed himself to the task of reorganizing and consolidating the themes in Asia Minor. His successor, Constantine V, won noteworthy victories in northern Syria, and thoroughly undermined Bulgar strength. In the beginning of the 9th century the Arabs captured Crete, and successfully attacked Sicily, but on 3 September 863, general Petronas attained a huge victory against the emir of Melitene. Under the leadership of Krum the Bulgar threat also reemerged, but in 814 Krum's son, Omortag, arranged a peace with the Byzantine Empire.59 The 8th and 9th centuries were also dominated by controversy and religious division over Iconoclasm. Icons were banned by Leo and Constantine, leading to revolts by iconodules supporters of icons throughout the empire. After the efforts of Empress Irene, the Second Council of Nicaea met in 787, and affirmed that icons could be venerated but not worshipped. Irene is said to have endeavored to negotiate a marriage between herself and Charlemagne, but, according to Theophanes the Confessor, the scheme was frustrated by Aetios, one of her favourites.60 In 813 Leo V the Armenian restored the policy of iconoclasm, but in 843 Empress Theodora restored the veneration of the icons with the help of Patriarch Methodios.61 Iconoclasm played its part in the further alienation of East from West, which worsened during the so-called Photian Schism, when Pope Nicholas I challenged Photios' elevation to the patriarchate. Macedonian dynasty and resurgence The Byzantine Empire reached its height under the Macedonian emperors of Armenian and Greek descent of the late 9th, 10th, and early 11th centuries, when it gained control over the Adriatic Sea, southern Italy, and all of the territory of tsar Samuel of Bulgaria. The cities of the empire expanded, and affluence spread across the provinces because of the new-found security. The population rose, and production increased, stimulating new demand while also helping to encourage trade. Culturally, there was considerable growth in education and learning. Ancient texts were preserved and patiently re-copied. Byzantine art flourished, and brilliant mosaics graced the interiors of the many new churches.62 Though the empire was significantly smaller than during the reign of Justinian, it was also stronger, as the remaining territories were less geographically dispersed and more politically and culturally integrated. Internal developments Although traditionally attributed to Basil I 867-886, initiator of the Macedonian dynasty, the Macedonian Renaissance has been more recently ascribed to the reforms of his predecessor, Michael III 842-867 and his wife's counsellor, the erudite Theoktistos. The latter in particular favoured culture at the court, and, with a careful financial policy, steadily increased the gold reserves of the Empire. The rise of the Macedonian dynasty coincided with internal developments which strengthened the religious unity of the empire.63 The iconoclast movement was experiencing a steep decline: this favoured its soft suppression by the emperors and the reconciliation of the religious strife that had drained the imperial resources in the previous centuries. Despite occasional tactical defeats, the administrative, legislative, cultural and economic situation continued to improve under Basil's successors, especially with Romanos I Lekapenos 920-944. The theme system reached its definitive form in this period. The church establishment began to loyally support the imperial cause, and the power of the landowning class was limited in favour of agricultural small holders, who made up an important part of the military force of the Empire. These favourable conditions contributed to the increasing ability of the emperors to wage war against the Arabs. Wars against the Muslims Byzantine Empire, c. 867 AD Byzantine Empire, c. 867 AD Main articles: Byzantine-Arab Wars 780-1180 and Muslim conquests By 867, the empire had re-stabilised its position in both the east and the west, and the efficiency of its defensive military structure enabled its emperors to begin planning wars of reconquest in the east. The process of reconquest began with variable fortunes. The temporary reconquest of Crete 843 was followed by a crushing Byzantine defeat on the Bosporus, while the emperors were unable to prevent the ongoing Muslim conquest of Sicily 827-902. Using present day Tunisia as their launching pad, the Muslims conquered Palermo in 831, Messina in 842, Enna in 859, Syracuse in 878, Catania in 900 and the final Byzantine stronghold, the fortress of Taormina, in 902. These drawbacks were later counterbalanced by a victorious expion against Damietta in Egypt 856, the defeat of the Emir of Melitene 863, the confirmation of the imperial authority over Dalmatia 867, and Basil I's offensives towards the Euphrates 870s. Unlike the deteriorating situation in Sicily, Basil I handled the situation in southern Italy well enough and the province would remain in Byzantine hands for the next 200 years. The threat from the Muslims was meanwhile reduced by inner struggles and by the rise of the Turks in the east. Muslims received assistance however from the Paulician sect, which had found a large following in the eastern provinces of the Empire and, facing persecution under the Byzantines, often fought under the Arab flag. It took several campaigns to subdue the Paulicians, who were eventually defeated by Basil I.62 In 904, disaster struck the empire when its second city, Thessaloniki, was sacked by an Arab fleet led by a Byzantine renegade. The Byzantine military responded by destroying an Arab fleet in 908, and sacking the city of Laodicea in Syria two years later. Despite this revenge, the Byzantines were still unable to strike a decisive blow against the Muslims, who inflicted a crushing defeat on the imperial forces when they attempted to regain Crete in 911. The situation on the border with the Arab territories remained fluid, with the Byzantines alternatively on the offensive or defensive. The Varangians, who attacked Constantinople for the first time in 860, constituted another new challenge. In 941 they appeared on the Asian shore of the Bosporus, but this time they were crushed, showing the improvements in the Byzantine military position after 907, when only diplomacy had been able to push back the invaders. The vanquisher of the Varangians was the famous general John Kourkouas, who continued the offensive with other noteworthy victories in Mesopotamia 943: these culminated in the reconquest of Edessa 944, which was especially celebrated for the return to Constantinople of the venerated Mandylion. The soldier emperors Nikephoros II Phokas reigned 963-969 and John I Tzimiskes 969-976 expanded the empire well into Syria, defeating the emirs of north-west Iraq and reconquering Crete and Cyprus. At one point under John, the empire's armies even threatened Jerusalem, far to the south. The emirate of Aleppo and its neighbours became vassals of the empire in the east, where the greatest threat to the empire was the Egyptian Fatimid kingdom.62 After much campaigning, the last Arab threat to Byzantium was defeated when Basil II rapidly drew 40,000 mounted soldiers to relieve Roman Syria. With a surplus of resources and victories thanks to the Bulgar and Syrian campaigns, Basil II planned an expion against Sicily to re-take it from the Arabs there. After his death in 1025, the expion set off in the 1040s and was met with initial, but stunted success. Wars against the Bulgarians For more details on this topic, see Byzantine-Bulgarian Wars. Emperor Basil II the Bulgar Slayer 976-1025. Emperor Basil II the Bulgar Slayer 976-1025. The traditional struggle with the See of Rome continued, spurred by the question of religious supremacy over the newly Christianized Bulgaria. This prompted an invasion by the powerful Tsar Simeon I in 894, but this was pushed back by the Byzantine diplomacy, which called on the help of the Hungarians. The Byzantines were in turn defeated, however, at the Battle of Bulgarophygon 896, and obliged to pay annual subsides to the Bulgarians. Later 912 Simeon even had the Byzantines grant him the crown of basileus of Bulgaria and had the young emperor Constantine VII marry one of his daughters. When a revolt in Constantinople halted his dynastic project, he again invaded Thrace and conquered Adrianople.62 A great imperial expion under Leo Phocas and Romanos Lekapenos ended again with a crushing Byzantine defeat at the Battle of Anchialus 917, and the following year the Bulgarians were free to ravage northern Greece up to Corinth. Adrianople was captured again in 923 and in 924 a Bulgarian army laid siege to Constantinople. The situation in the Balkans improved only after Simeon's death in 927. The Empire under Basil II The Empire under Basil II Under the emperor Basil II reigned 976-1025, the Bulgarians, who had conquered much of the Balkans from the Byzantines since their arrival three hundred years previously, became the target of annual campaigns by the Byzantine army. The war was to drag on for nearly twenty years, but eventually at the Battle of Kleidon the Bulgarians were completely defeated.64 The Bulgarian army was captured, and it is said that 99 out of every 100 men were blinded, with the remaining hundredth man left with one eye so as to lead his compatriots home. When Tsar Samuil saw the broken remains of his once gallant army, he died of shock. In 1018 Bulgaria surrendered and became part of the empire. This stunning victory restored the Danube frontier, which had not been held since the days of the emperor Heraclius.62 The empire also gained a new ally at this time in the new state in Kiev, from which the empire received an important mercenary force, the famous Varangian Guard, in exchange for the marriage of Basil's sister Anna to Vladimir I of Kiev.62 During this period the Byzantine princess Theophanu, wife of the Holy Roman Emperor Otto II, served as regent of the Holy Roman Empire, paving the way for the westward spread of Byzantine culture. Triumph The Byzantine Empire and its themata in 1045. At this point, the Empire was the most powerful state in the Merranean. The Byzantine Empire and its themata in 1045. At this point, the Empire was the most powerful state in the Merranean. The Byzantine Empire now stretched to Armenia in the east, to Calabria in Southern Italy in the west.62 Many successes had been achieved, ranging from the conquest of Bulgaria, to the annexation of parts of Georgia and Armenia, to the total annihilation of an invading force of Egyptians outside Antioch. Yet even these victories were not enough; Basil considered the continued Arab occupation of Sicily to be an outrage. Accordingly, he planned to reconquer the island, which had belonged to the empire for over 300 years c. 550 - c. 900. However, his death in 1025 put an end to the project.62 The 11th century was also momentous for its religious events. In 1054, relations between Greek-speaking Eastern and Latin-speaking Western traditions within the Christian Church reached a terminal crisis. Although there was a formal declaration of institutional separation, on 16 July, when three papal legates entered the Hagia Sophia during Divine Liturgy on a Saturday afternoon and placed a bull of excommunication on the altar, the so-called Great Schism was actually the culmination of centuries of gradual separation. Although the schism was brought about by doctrinal disputes in particular, Eastern refusal to accept the Western Church doctrine of the filioque, or double procession of the Holy Spirit, disputes over administration and political issues had simmered for centuries. The formal separation of the Byzantine Orthodox Church and the Western Catholic Church would have wide ranging consequences for the future of Byzantium. Crisis and fragmentation Diptych of Romanos and Eudocia Macrembolitissa crowned by Christ Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris. Diptych of Romanos and Eudocia Macrembolitissa crowned by Christ Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris. Byzantium soon fell into a period of difficulties, caused to a large extent by the undermining of the theme system and the neglect of the military. Nikephoros II, John Tzimiskes and Basil II changed the military divisions τάγματα, tagmata from a rapid response, primarily defensive, citizen army into a professional, campaigning army increasingly manned by mercenaries. Mercenaries, however, were expensive and as the threat of invasion receded in the 10th century, so did the need for maintaining large garrisons and expensive fortifications.65 Basil II left a burgeoning treasury upon his death, but neglected to plan for his succession. None of his immediate successors had any particular military or political talent and the administration of the Empire increasingly fell into the hands of the civil service. Efforts to revive the Byzantine economy only resulted in inflation and a debased gold coinage. The army was now seen as both an unnecessary expense and a political threat. Therefore, native troops were cashiered and replaced by foreign mercenaries on specific contract.66 Map of Italy on the eve of the arrival of the Normans Map of Italy on the eve of the arrival of the Normans At the same time, the Empire was faced with new, ambitious enemies. Byzantine provinces in southern Italy faced the Normans, who arrived in Italy at the beginning of the 11th century. The allied forces of Melus of Bari and the Normans were defeated at the Battle of Cannae in 1018, and two decades later Michael IV the Paphlagonian equipped an expion for the reconquest of Sicily from the Arabs. Although the campaign was initially successful, the reconquest of Sicily was not accomplished, mainly because George Maniaces, the commander of the Byzantine forces, was recalled when he was suspected of having ambitious schemes. During a period of strife between Byzantium and Rome which ended in the East-West Schism of 1054, the Normans began to advance, slowly but steadily, into Byzantine Italy.67 It was in Asia Minor, however, that the greatest disaster would take place. The Seljuq Turks made their first explorations across the Byzantine frontier into Armenia in 1065 and in 1067. The emergency lent weight to the military aristocracy in Anatolia who, in 1068, secured the election of one of their own, Romanos Diogenes, as emperor. In the summer of 1071, Romanos undertook a massive eastern campaign to draw the Seljuks into a general engagement with the Byzantine army. At Manzikert Romanos not only suffered a surprise defeat at the hands of Sultan Alp Arslan, but was also captured. Alp Arslan treated him with respect, and imposed no harsh terms on the Byzantines.66 In Constantinople, however, a coup took place in favor of Michael Doukas, who soon faced the opposition of Nikephoros Bryennios and Nikephoros Botaneiates. By 1081 the Seljuks expanded their rule over virtually the entire Anatolian plateau from Armenia in the east to Bithynia in the west and founded their capital in Nicea.68 Komnenian dynasty and the crusaders For more details on this topic, see Byzantium under the Komnenoi. See also: Byzantine-Seljuk wars Alexios I and the First Crusade For more details on this topic, see Alexios I Komnenos. See also: First Crusade The Byzantine Empire and the Sultanate of Rum before the Crusades The Byzantine Empire and the Sultanate of Rum before the Crusades After Manzikert, a partial recovery referred to as the Komnenian restoration was made possible by the efforts of the Komnenian dynasty.69 The first emperor of this royal line was Isaac I 1057-1059 and the second Alexios I. At the very outset of his reign, Alexios faced a formidable attack by the Normans under Robert Guiscard and his son Bohemund of Taranto, who captured Dyrrhachium and Corfu, and laid siege to Larissa in Thessaly. Robert Guiscard's death in 1085 temporarily eased the Norman problem. The following year the Seljuq sultan died, and the sultanate was split by internal rivalries. By his own efforts, Alexios defeated the Pechenegs; they were caught by surprise and annihilated at the Battle of Levounion on 28 April 1091.17 Having achieved stability in the West, Alexios could turn his attention to the severe economic difficulties and the disintegration of the empire's traditional defences.70 However, he still did not have enough manpower to recover the lost territories in Asia Minor, and to advance against the Seljuks. At the Council of Piacenza in 1095, Alexios' envoys spoke to Pope Urban II about the suffering of the Christians of the East, and underscored that without help from the West they would continue to suffer under Muslim rule. Urban saw Alexius' request as a dual opportunity to cement Western Europe and enhance papal power.71 On 27 November 1095, Pope Urban II called together the Council of Clermont, and urged all those present to take up arms under the sign of the Cross and launch an armed pilgrimage to recover Jerusalem and the East from the Muslims. The response in Western Europe was overwhelming.17 The very brief first coinage of the Thessaloniki mint, which Alexios opened as he passed through in September 1081 on his way to confront the invading Normans under Robert Guiscard. The very brief first coinage of the Thessaloniki mint, which Alexios opened as he passed through in September 1081 on his way to confront the invading Normans under Robert Guiscard. Alexios had anticipated help in the form of mercenary forces from the West, but was totally unprepared for the immense and undisciplined force which soon arrived in Byzantine territory. It was no comfort to Alexius to learn that four of the eight leaders of the main body of the Crusade were Normans, among them Bohemund. Since the crusade had to pass through Constantinople, however, the Emperor had some control over it. He required its leaders to swear to restore to the empire any towns or territories they might conquer from the Turks on their way to the Holy Land. In return, he gave them guides and a military escort.72 Alexios was able to recover a number of important cities and islands, and in fact much of western Asia Minor. Nevertheless, the crusaders believed their oaths were invalidated when Alexios did not help them during the siege of Antioch he had in fact set out on the road to Antioch, but had been persuaded to turn back by Stephen of Blois, who assured him that all was lost and that the expion had already failed.73 Bohemund, who had set himself up as Prince of Antioch, briefly went to war with the Byzantines, but agreed to become Alexios' vassal under the Treaty of Devol in 1108, which marked the end of Norman threat during Alexios' reign.74 Medieval manuscript depicting the Capture of Jerusalem during the First Crusade. Medieval manuscript depicting the Capture of Jerusalem during the First Crusade. Alexios reconstituted the army and navy, but only by means of stabilizing the gold coinage at one-third of its original value and by imposing supplementary taxes. The supply of native soldiers had virtually ceased with the disappearance or absorption of their military holdings. Alexios promoted an alternative source of native manpower by extending the system of granting estates in pronoia by favour of the emperor and tying the grant to a military obligation. Similarly, Alexios tried to promote more profitable development of the estates of the church by granting them to the management of laymen.17 The final years of Alexios's reign were marked by persecution of the followers of the Paulician and Bogomil heresies, and by anxieties as to the succession, which his wife Irene Doukaina wished to alter in favor of her daughter Anna's husband, Nikephoros Bryennios.75 John II, Manuel I and the Second Crusade Main articles: John II Komnenos and Manuel I Komnenos John II Komnenos left the imperial treasury full, and did not call for the execution or maiming of a single subject during his reign. Nicknamed 'John the Good', he is regarded by the Byzantine historian Niketas Choniates as the best emperor of the Komnenian dynasty. John II Komnenos left the imperial treasury full, and did not call for the execution or maiming of a single subject during his reign. Nicknamed 'John the Good', he is regarded by the Byzantine historian Niketas Choniates as the best emperor of the Komnenian dynasty.76 Alexios' son John II Komnenos succeeded him in 1118, and was to rule until 1143. John was a pious and dedicated emperor who was determined to undo the damage his empire had suffered at the battle of Manzikert, half a century earlier.77 Famed for his piety and his remarkably mild and just reign, John was an exceptional example of a moral ruler, at a time when cruelty was the norm.78 For this reason, he has been called the Byzantine Marcus Aurelius. In the course of his twenty-five year reign, John made alliances with the Holy Roman Empire in the west, decisively defeated the Pechenegs at the Battle of Beroia,79 and personally led numerous campaigns against the Turks in Asia Minor. John's campaigns fundamentally changed the balance of power in the east, forcing the Turks onto the defensive and restoring to the Byzantines many towns, fortresses and cities right across the peninsula.76 He also thwarted Hungarian, and Serbian threats during the 1120s, and in 1130 allied himself with the German emperor Lothair III against the Norman King Roger II of Sicily.80 In the later part of his reign John focused his activities on the East. He defeated the Danishmend emirate of Melitene, and reconquered all of Cilicia, while forcing Raymond of Poitiers, Prince of Antioch, to recognize Byzantine suzerainty. In an effort to demonstrate the Byzantine emperor's role as the leader of the Christian world, John marched into the Holy Land at the head of the combined forces of Byzantium and the Crusader states; yet despite the great vigour with which he pressed the campaign, John's hopes were disappointed by the treachery of his Crusader allies.81 In 1142 John returned to press his claims to Antioch, but he died in the spring of 1143 following a hunting accident. Raymond was emboldened to invade Cilicia, but he was defeated and forced to go to Constantinople to beg mercy from the new emperor.82 Byzantine Empire in purple, c.1180, at the end of the Komnenian period Byzantine Empire in purple, c.1180, at the end of the Komnenian period John's chosen heir was his fourth son, Manuel I Komnenos, who campaigned aggressively against his neighbours both in the west and in the east. In Palestine, he allied himself with the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem and sent a large fleet to participate in a combined invasion of Fatimid Egypt. Manuel reinforced his position as overlord of the Crusader states, with his hegemony over Antioch and Jerusalem secured by agreement with Raynald, Prince of Antioch, and Amalric, King of Jerusalem respectively.83 In an effort to restore Byzantine control over the ports of southern Italy, he sent an expion to Italy in 1155, but disputes within the coalition led to the eventual failure of the campaign. Despite this military setback, Manuel's armies successfully invaded the Kingdom of Hungary in 1167, defeating the Hungarians at the Battle of Sirmium. By 1168 nearly the whole of the eastern Adriatic coast lay in Manuel's hands.84 Manuel made several alliances with the Pope and Western Christian kingdoms, and successfully handled the passage of the Second Crusade through his empire.85 Although hopes for a lasting Papal-Byzantine alliance came up against insuperable problems, Pope Innocent III clearly had a positive view of Manuel when he told Alexios III that he should imitate your predecessor Manuel of famous memory who always replied favourably to ourselves and our predecessors.86 In the east, however, Manuel suffered a major defeat at the Battle of Myriokephalon, in 1176, against the Turks. Yet the losses were quickly made good, and in the following year Manuel's forces inflicted a defeat upon a force of picked Turks.87 The Byzantine commander John Vatatzes, who destroyed the Turkish invaders at the Battle of Hyelion and Leimocheir, not only brought troops from the capital but also was able to gather an army along the way; a sign that the Byzantine army remained strong and that the defensive program of western Asia Minor was still successful.88 12th century Renaissance For more details on this topic, see Byzantine civilisation in the twelfth century. See also: Komnenian army John and Manuel pursued active military policies, and both deployed considerable resources on sieges and on city defenses; aggressive fortification policies were at the heart of their imperial military policies.89 Despite the defeat at Myriokephalon, the policies of Alexios, John and Manuel resulted in vast territorial gains, increased frontier stability in Asia Minor, and secured the stabilization of the empire's European frontiers. From c.1081 to c.1180, the Komnenian army assured the empire's security, enabling Byzantine civilization to flourish.90 The most famous of the surviving Byzantine mosaics of the Hagia Sophia - Christ Pantocrator flanked by the Virgin Mary and John the Baptist. The mosaics were made in the 12th century. The most famous of the surviving Byzantine mosaics of the Hagia Sophia - Christ Pantocrator flanked by the Virgin Mary and John the Baptist. The mosaics were made in the 12th century. This allowed the Western provinces to achieve an economic revival which continued until the close of the century. It has been argued that Byzantium under the Komnenian rule was more prosperous than at any time since the Persian invasions of the 7th century. During the 12th century population levels rose and extensive tracts of new agricultural land were brought into production. Archaeological evidence from both Europe and Asia Minor shows a considerable increase in the size of urban settlements, together with a notable upsurge in new towns. Trade was also flourishing; the Venetians, the Genoese and others opened up the ports of the Aegean to commerce, shipping goods from the Crusader kingdoms of Outremer and Fatimid Egypt to the west and trading with the Byzantine Empire via Constantinople.91 In artistic terms, there was a revival in mosaic, and regional schools of architecture began producing many distinctive styles that drew on a range of cultural influences.92 During the 12th century the Byzantines provided their model of early humanism as a renaissance of interest in classical authors. In Eustathius of Thessalonica Byzantine humanism found its most characteristic expression.93 Decline and disintegration Main article: Byzantium under the Angeloi Dynasty of the Angeloi and Third Crusade Whatever paper might be presented to the Emperor Alexios III for his signature, he signed it immediately; it did not matter that in this paper there was a senseless agglomeration of words, or that the supplicant demanded that one might sail by land or till the sea, or that mountains should be transferred into the middle of the seas or, as a tale says, that Athos should be put upon Olympus. Nicetas Choniates94 Manuel's death on 24 September 1180 left his 11-year-old son Alexios II Komnenos on the throne. Alexios was highly incompetent at the office, but it was his mother, Maria of Antioch, and her Frankish background that made his regency unpopular.95 Eventually Andronikos I Komnenos, a grandson of Alexios I, launched a revolt against his younger relative and managed to overthrow him in a violent coup d'état. Utilizing his good looks and his immense popularity with the army, he marched on to Constantinople in August 1182, and incited a massacre of the Latins.96 After eliminating his potential rivals, he had himself crowned as co-emperor in September 1183; he eliminated Alexios II and even took his 12-year-old wife Agnes of France for himself.96 This troubled succession weakened the dynastic continuity and solidarity on which the strength of the Byzantine state had come to rely.97 The new emperor was a man of astounding contrasts.97 Handsome and eloquent, Andronikos was at the same time known for his licentious exploits.98 Energetic, able and determined, he had been called a true Komnenos.99 However, he was also capable of terrifying brutality, violence and cruelty.97 Andronikos began his reign well; in particular, the measures he took to reform the government of the empire have been praised by historians. According to George Ostrogorsky, Andronikos was determined to root out corruption: Under his rule the sale of offices ceased; selection was based on merit, rather than favoritism; officials were paid an adequate salary so as to reduce the temptation of bribery. In the provinces Andronikos' reforms produced a speedy and marked improvement.97 The people felt the severity of his laws, but acknowledged their justice, and found themselves protected from the rapacity of their superiors.97 Andronikos' efforts to rein in the oppressive tax collectors and officials of the empire did much to alleviate the lot of the peasantry, but his attempt to check the power of the nobility was considerably more problematic. The aristocrats were infuriated against him, and to make matters worse, Andronikos seems to have become increasingly unbalanced; executions and violence became increasingly common, and his reign turned into a reign of terror.100 Andronikos seemed almost to seek the extermination of the aristocracy as a whole. The struggle against the aristocracy turned into wholesale slaughter, while the emperor resorted to ever more ruthless measures to shore up his regime.97 Despite his military background, Andronikos failed to deal with Isaac Komnenos, Béla III who reincorporated Croatian territories into Hungary, and Stephen Nemanja of Serbia who declared his independence from Byzantium. Yet none of these troubles would compare to William II of Sicily's invasion force of 300 ships and 80,000 men, arriving in 1185.101 Andronikos mobilized a small fleet of 100 ships to defend the capital but other than that he was indifferent to the populace. He was finally overthrown when Isaac Angelos, surviving an imperial assassination attempt, seized power with the aid of the people and had Andronikos killed.102 Iconium is won by the Third Crusade. Iconium is won by the Third Crusade. The reign of Isaac II, and, still more, that of his brother Alexios III, saw the collapse of what remained of the centralized machinery of Byzantine government and defense. Although, the Normans were driven out of Greece, in 1186 the Bulgars began a rebellion that was to lead to the formation of the Second Bulgarian Empire. The mismanagement of the Third Crusade clearly demonstrated Byzantium's weaknesses under the Angeli. When Richard I of England appropriated Cyprus from its ruler, Isaac Komnenos, he refused to hand it back to the Empire,103 And when Frederick Barbarossa conquered Iconium, Isaac failed to seize the initiative.104 The internal policy of the Angeloi was characterized by the squandering of the public treasure, and the fiscal maladministration. Byzantine authority was severely weakened, and the growing power vacuum at the center of the empire encouraged fragmentation. There is evidence that some Komnenian heirs had set up a semi-independent state in Trebizond before 1204.105 According to Alexander Vasiliev, the dynasty of the Angeloi, Greek in its origin, ... accelerated the ruin of the Empire, already weakened without and disunited within.94 Fourth Crusade For more details on this topic, see Fourth Crusade. The Entry of the Crusaders into Constantinople, by Eugène Delacroix 1840, oil on canvas, 410 x 498 cm, Louvre, Paris. The Entry of the Crusaders into Constantinople, by Eugène Delacroix 1840, oil on canvas, 410 x 498 cm, Louvre, Paris. In 1198, Pope Innocent III broached the subject of a new crusade through legates and encyclical letters.106 The stated intent of the crusade was to conquer Egypt, now the centre of Muslim power in the Levant. The crusader army that arrived at Venice in the summer of 1202 was somewhat smaller than had been anticipated, and there were not sufficient funds to pay the Venetians, whose fleet was hired by the crusaders to take them to Egypt. Venetian policy under the aging and blind but still ambitious Doge Enrico Dandolo was potentially at variance with that of the Pope and the crusaders, because Venice was closely related commercially with Egypt.107 The crusaders accepted the suggestion that in lieu of payment they assist the Venetians in the capture of the Christian port of Zara in Dalmatia vassal city of Venice, which had rebelled and placed itself under Hungary's protection in 1186.108 The city fell in November 1202 after a brief siege.109 Innocent, who was informed of the plan, but his veto was disregarded, was reluctant to jeopardize the Crusade, and gave conditional absolution to the crusaders-not, however, to the Venetians.107 After the death of Theobald III, Count of Champagne, the leadership of the Crusade passed to Boniface of Montferrat, a friend of the Hohenstaufen Philip of Swabia. Both Boniface and Philip had married into the Byzantine imperial family. In fact, Philip's brother-in-law, Alexios Angelos, son of the deposed and blinded emperor Isaac II Angelos, had appeared in Europe seeking aid and had made contacts with the crusaders. Alexios offered to reunite the Byzantine church with Rome, pay the crusaders 200,000 silver marks, and join the crusade with 200,000 silver marks and all the supplies they needed to get to Egypt.110 Innocent was aware of a plan to divert the Crusade to Constantinople, and forbade any attack on the city; but the papal letter arrived after the fleets had left Zara. Alexios III made no preparations for the defense of the city; thus, when the Venetian fleet entered the waters of Constantinople on 24 June 1203, they encountered little resistance.110 In the summer of 1203 Alexios III fled, and Alexios Angelos was elevated to the throne as Alexios IV along with his blind father Isaac. Innocent reprimanded the leaders of the crusaders, and ordered them to proceed forthwith to the Holy Land.111 None of you should therefore dare to assume that it is permissible for you to seize or to plunder the land of the Greeks, even though the latter may be disobedient to the Apostolic See, or on the grounds that the Emperor of Constantinople has deposed and even blinded his brother and usurped the imperial throne. For though this same emperor and the men entrusted to his rule may have sinned, both in these and in other matters, it is not for you to judge their faults, nor have you assumed the sign of the cross to punish this injury; rather you specifically pledged your self to the duty of avenging the insult to the cross. Innocent III to Boniface I of Montferrat, Baldwin IX, Count of Flanders, and Louis I, Count of Blois Ferentino, summer 1203, c. 20 June.112 When in late November 1203 Alexios IV announced that his promises were hard to keep as the empire was short on funds he had managed to pay roughly half of the promised amount of 200,000 silver marks, and could not fulfil his promise that he would cover the Venetians' rent of the fleet for the crusaders.113, the crusaders declared war on him. Meanwhile, internal opposition to Alexios IV grew, and, on 25 January 1204, one of his courtiers, Alexios Doukas killed him, and took the throne himself as Alexios V; Isaac died soon afterwards, probably naturally.114 The crusaders and Venetians, incensed at the murder of their supposed patron, prepared to assault the Byzantine capital. They decided that 12 electors six Venetians and six crusaders should choose a Latin emperor.107 Map to show the partition of the empire following the Fourth Crusade, c. 1204. Map to show the partition of the empire following the Fourth Crusade, c. 1204. Eventually, the crusaders took the city on 13 April 1204. Constantinople was subjected by the rank and file to pillage and massacre for three days. Many priceless icons, relics, and other objects later turned up in Western Europe, a large number in Venice. According to Choniates, a prostitute was even set up on the Patriarchal throne.115 When Innocent III heard of the conduct of his crusaders, he castigated them in no uncertain terms. But the situation was beyond his control, especially after his legate, on his own initiative, had absolved the crusaders from their vow to proceed to the Holy Land.116 When order had been restored, the crusaders and the Venetians proceeded to implement their agreement; Baldwin of Flanders was elected emperor and the Venetian Thomas Morosini chosen patriarch. The lands parcelled out among the leaders did not include all the former Byzantine possessions. The Byzantine rule continued in Nicaea, Trebizond, and Epirus.107 Fall Main articles: Decline of the Byzantine Empire, Byzantium under the Palaiologoi, and Byzantine-Ottoman wars Empire in exile Middle East c. 1263 Middle East c. 1263 After the sack of Constantinople in 1204 by Latin Crusaders, three Byzantine successor states were established: the Empire of Nicaea, the Empire of Trebizond and the Despotate of Epirus. Of these three successor states, Epirus and Nicaea stood the best chance of reclaiming Constantinople. The Nicaean Empire struggled, however, to survive the next few decades, and by the mid 13th century it lost much of southern Anatolia.117 The weakening of the Sultanate of Rum following the Mongol Invasion in 1242-43 allowed many Beyliks and fanatical ghazis to set up their own principalities in Anatolia, weakening the Byzantine hold on Asia Minor.118 In time, one of the Beys, Osman I, created an empire that would conquer Byzantium. However, the Mongol Invasion also gave Nicaea a temporary respite from Seljuk attacks allowing it to concentrate on the Latin Empire only north of its position. Reconquest of Constantinople Map of the Middle East c. 1355. Byzantium has lost its territory in Asia Minor and Epirus has been reduced significantly by Serbia. Ottoman lands are in purple, and Red Byzantium. Map of the Middle East c. 1355. Byzantium has lost its territory in Asia Minor and Epirus has been reduced significantly by Serbia. Ottoman lands are in purple, and Red Byzantium. The Empire of Nicaea, founded by the Laskarid dynasty, managed to reclaim Constantinople from the Latins in 1261 and defeat Epirus. This led to a short-lived revival of Byzantine fortunes under Michael VIII Palaiologos, but the war-ravaged empire was ill-equipped to deal with the enemies that now surrounded it. In order to maintain his campaigns against the Latins, Michael pulled troops from Asia Minor, and levied crippling taxes on the peasantry, causing much resentment.119 Massive construction projects were completed in Constantinople to repair the damages of the Fourth Crusade, but none of these initiatives was of any comfort to the farmers in Asia Minor, suffering raids from fanatical ghazis. Rather than holding on to his possessions in Asia Minor, Michael chose to expand the Empire, gaining only short-term success. To avoid another sacking of the capital by the Latins, he forced the Church to submit to Rome, again a temporary solution for which the peasantry hated Michael and Constantinople.120 The efforts of Andronikos II and later his grandson Andronikos III marked Byzantium's last genuine attempts in restoring the glory of the empire. However, the use of mercenaries by Andronikos II would often backfire, with the Catalan Company ravaging the countryside and increasing resentment towards Constantinople121 By 1390, Philadelphia, the last Byzantine stronghold in inner Asia Minor, fell to the Turks. Civil war wrecked the empire during the 14th century, since Andronikos III's successor was far too young to rule and the resulting regency's rivalry tore the Empire. The Asian provinces were lost to the Turks, while the Serbians and Bulgarians conquered the Empire's remaining territory in Europe. For a while, the empire survived simply because the Turks of Anatolia were too divided to attack. Nevertheless, the unifying influence of Osman I 1258-1326 allowed the newly founded Ottoman Empire to deprive the Byzantines of all but a handful of port cities.75 Rise of the Ottomans and fall of Constantinople Things went worse for Byzantium, when, during the civil war, an earthquake at Gallipoli in 1354 devastated the fort, allowing the Turks the very next day to cross into Europe.122 By the time the Byzantine civil war had ended, the Ottomans had defeated the Serbians and subjugated them as vassals. Following the Battle of Kosovo, much of the Balkans became dominated by the Ottomans.123 Eastern Merranean just before the fall of Constantinople. Eastern Merranean just before the fall of Constantinople. The Emperors appealed to the west for help, but the Pope would only consider sending aid in return for a reunion of the Eastern Orthodox Church with the See of Rome. Church unity was considered, and occasionally accomplished by imperial decree, but the Orthodox citizenry and clergy intensely resented Roman authority and the Latin Rite.124 Some western mercenaries arrived to bolster the Christian defence of Constantinople, but most Western rulers, distracted by their own affairs, did nothing as the Ottomans picked apart the remaining Byzantine territories.125 Constantinople by this stage was underpopulated and dilapidated. The population of the city had collapsed so severely that it was now little more than a cluster of villages separated by fields. On 2 April 1453, the Sultan's army of some 80,000 men and large numbers of irregulars laid siege to the city.126 Despite a desperate last-ditch defense of the city by the massively outnumbered Christian forces c. 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreign mercenaries125, Constantinople finally fell to the Ottomans after a two-month siege on 29 May 1453. The last Byzantine emperor, Constantine XI Palaiologos, was last seen casting off his imperial regalia and throwing himself into hand-to-hand combat after the walls of the city were taken. Aftermath The siege of Constantinople in 1453 according to a 15th century French miniature. The siege of Constantinople in 1453 according to a 15th century French miniature. Mehmed II went on to conquer the Greek statelets of Mistra in 1460 and Trebizond in 1461. The nephew of the last Emperor, Constantine XI, Andreas Palaeologos had inherited the defunct title of Byzantine Emperor and used it from 1465 until his death in 1503.6 By the end of the 15th century, the Ottoman Empire had established its firm rule over Asia Minor and parts of the Balkan peninsula. Mehmed II and his successors continued to consider themselves proper heirs to the Byzantine Empire until the demise of the Ottoman Empire in the early 20th century. Meanwhile, the Danubian Principalities harbored Orthodox refugees, including some Byzantine nobles. At his death, the role of the emperor as a patron of Eastern Orthodoxy was claimed by Ivan III, Grand Duke of Muscovy. He had married Andreas' sister, Sophia Paleologue, whose grandson, Ivan IV, would become the first Tsar of Russia tsar, or czar, meaning caesar, is a term traditionally applied by Slavs to the Byzantine Emperors. Their successors supported the idea that Moscow was the proper heir to Rome and Constantinople. The idea of the Russian Empire as the new, Third Rome was kept alive until its demise with the Russian Revolution of 1917.127 Culture Byzantine Culture Art Aristocracy Bureaucracy Army Architecture Coinage Cuisine Dance Diplomacy Dress Economy Gardens Law Literature Music Medicine Navy Science Economy For more details on this topic, see Byzantine economy. The Byzantine economy was among the most advanced in Europe and the Merranean for many centuries. Europe, in particular, was unable to match Byzantine economic strength until late in the Middle Ages. Constantinople was a prime hub in a trading network that at various times extended across nearly all of Eurasia and North Africa, in particular being the primary western terminus of the famous silk road. Some scholars argue that, up until the arrival of the Arabs in the 7th century, the Empire had the most powerful economy in the world. The Arab conquests, however, would represent a substantial reversal of fortunes contributing to a period of decline and stagnation. Constantine V's reforms c. 765 marked the beginning of a revival that continued until 1204. From the 10th century until the end of the 12th, the Byzantine Empire projected an image of luxury, and the travelers were impressed by the wealth accumulated in the capital. All this changed with the arrival of the Fourth Crusade, which was an economic catastrophe.128 The Palaiologoi tried to revive the economy, but the late Byzantine state would not gain full control of either the foreign or domestic economic forces. Gradually, it also lost its influence on the modalities of trade and the price mechanisms, and its control over the outflow of precious metals and, according to some scholars, even over the minting of coins.129 Solidus of Justinian II, second reign, after 705 Solidus of Justinian II, second reign, after 705 One of the economic foundations of the empire was trade. Textiles must have been by far the most important item of export; silks were certainly imported into Egypt, and appeared also in Bulgaria, and the West.130 The state strictly controlled both the internal and the international trade, and retained the monopoly of issuing coinage. The government exercised formal control over interest rates, and set the parameters for the activity of the guilds and corporations, in which it had a special interest. The emperor and its officials intervened at times of crisis to ensure the provisioning of the capital, and to keep down the price of cereals. Finally, the government often collected part of the surplus through taxation, and put it back into circulation, through redistribution in the form of salaries to state officials, or in the form of investment in public works.131 Science, Medicine, Law The frontispiece of the Vienna Dioscurides, which shows a set of seven famous physicians. The frontispiece of the Vienna Dioscurides, which shows a set of seven famous physicians. For more details on this topic, see Byzantine science. See also: Byzantine medicine and Byzantine law The writings of Classical antiquity never ceased to be cultivated in Byzantium. Therefore, Byzantine science was in every period closely connected with ancient philosophy, and metaphysics.132 Although at various times the Byzantines made magnificent achievements in the application of the sciences notably in the construction of the Hagia Sophia, after the 6th century Byzantine scholars made few novel contributions to science in terms of developing new theories or extending the ideas of classical authors.133 Scholarship particularly lagged during the dark years of plague and the Arab conquests, but then during the so-called Byzantine Renaissance at the end of the first millennium Byzantine scholars re-asserted themselves becoming experts in the scientific developments of the Arabs and Persians, particularly in astronomy and mathematics.134 In the final century of the Empire, Byzantine grammarians were those principally responsible for carrying, in person and in writing, ancient Greek grammatical and literary studies to early Renaissance Italy.135 During this period astronomy and other mathematical sciences were taught in Trebizond; medicine attracted the interest of almost all scholars.136 In the field of law, Justinian I's reforms had a clear effect on the evolution of jurisprudence, and Leo III's Ecloga influenced the formation of legal institutions in the Slav world.137 Religion Further information: Eastern Orthodox Church As a symbol and expression of the universal prestige of the Patriarchate of Constantinople, Justinian built the Church of the Holy Wisdom of God, Hagia Sophia, which was completed in the short period of four and a half years 532-537. As a symbol and expression of the universal prestige of the Patriarchate of Constantinople, Justinian built the Church of the Holy Wisdom of God, Hagia Sophia, which was completed in the short period of four and a half years 532-537. According to Joseph Raya, Byzantine culture and Orthodoxy are one and the same.138 The survival of the Empire in the East assured an active role of the Emperor in the affairs of the Church. The Byzantine state inherited from pagan times the administrative, and financial routine of administering religious affairs, and this routine was applied to the Christian Church. Following the pattern set by Eusebius of Caesarea, the Byzantines thought of the Emperor as a representative or messenger of Christ, responsible particularly for the propagation of Christianity among pagans, and for the externals of the religion, such as administration and finances. The imperial role, however, in the affairs of the Church never developed into a fixed, legally defined system.139 With the decline of Rome, and internal dissension in the other Eastern patriarchates, the church of Constantinople became, between the 6th and 11th centuries, the richest and most influential center of Christendom.140 Even when the Empire was reduced to only a shadow of itself, the Church, as an institution, had never exercised so much influence both inside and outside of the imperial frontiers. As George Ostrogorsky points out: The Patriarchate of Constantinople remained the center of the Orthodox world, with subordinate metropolitan sees and archbishoprics in the territory of Asia Minor and the Balkans, now lost to Byzantium, as well as in Caucasus, Russia and Lithuania. The Church remained the most stable element in the Byzantine Empire.141 Art and literature Main articles: Byzantine art and Byzantine literature See also: Byzantine music and Byzantine dress Miniatures of the 6th-century Rabula Gospel display the more abstract and symbolic nature of Byzantine art. Miniatures of the 6th-century Rabula Gospel display the more abstract and symbolic nature of Byzantine art. Architecture, painting, and other visual arts produced in the Byzantine Empire and in various areas that came under its influence. Byzantine art is almost entirely concerned with religious expression and, more specifically, with the impersonal translation of carefully controlled church theology into artistic terms. Byzantine forms were spread by trade and conquest to Italy and Sicily, where they persisted in modified form through the 12th century, and became formative influences on Italian Renaissance art. By means of the expansion of the Eastern Orthodox church, Byzantine forms spread to eastern European centers, particularly Russia.142 Influences from Byzantine architecture, particularly in religious buildings, can be found in diverse regions from Egypt and Arabia to Russia and Romania. In Byzantine literature, therefore, four different cultural elements are to be reckoned with: the Greek, the Christian, the Roman, and the Oriental. Byzantine literature is often classified in five groups: historians and annalists, encyclopedists Patriarch Photios, Michael Psellos, and Michael Choniates are regarded as the greatest encyclopedists of Byzantium and essayists, and writers of secular poetry The only genuine heroic epic of the Byzantines is the Digenis Acritas. The remaining two groups include the new literary species: ecclesiastical and theological literature, and popular poetry. Of the approximately two to three thousand volumes of Byzantine literature that survive, only three hundred and thirty consist of secular poetry, history, science and pseudo-science.143 While the most flourishing period of the secular literature of Byzantium runs from the ninth to the twelfth century, its religious literature sermons, liturgical books and poetry, theology, devotional treatises etc. developed much earlier with Romanos the Melodist being its most prominent representative.144 Government and bureaucracy The themes c. 650 The themes c. 650 The themes c. 950 The themes c. 950 See also: Byzantine aristocracy and bureaucracy In the Byzantine state, the emperor was the sole and absolute ruler, and his power was regarded as having divine origin.6 By the end of the 8th century, a civil administration focused on the court was formed as part of a large-scale consolidation of power in the capital the rise to pre-eminence of the position of sakellarios is related to this change.145 The most important reform of this period is the creation of themes, where civil and military administration is exercised by one person, the strategos.6 Despite the occasionally derogatory use of the word Byzantine, the Byzantine bureaucracy had a distinct ability for reinventing itself in accordance with the Empire's situation. The Byzantine system of titulature and precedence makes the imperial administration look like an ordered bureaucracy to modern observers. Officials were arranged in strict order around the emperor, and depended upon the imperial will for their ranks. There were also actual administrative jobs, but authority could be vested in individuals rather than offices.146 In the 8th and 9th centuries civil service constituted the clearest path to aristocratic status, but, starting in the 9th century, the civil aristocracy was rivaled by an aristocracy of nobility. According to some studies of Byzantine government, 11th-century politics were dominated by competition between the civil and the military aristocracy. During this period, Alexios I undertook important administrative reforms, including the creation of new courtly dignities and offices.147 Diplomacy For more details on this topic, see Byzantine diplomacy. Olga, ruler of Kievan Rus', along with her escort in Constantinople Madrid Skylitzes, Biblioteca Nacional de España, Madrid Olga, ruler of Kievan Rus', along with her escort in Constantinople Madrid Skylitzes, Biblioteca Nacional de España, Madrid After the fall of Rome, the key challenge to the Empire was to maintain a set of relations between itself and its sundry neighbors. When these nations set about forging formal political institutions, they were dependent on Constantinople. Byzantine diplomacy soon managed to draw its neighbors into a network of international and inter-state relations.148 This network revolved around treaty making, and included the welcoming of the new ruler into the family of kings, and the assimilation of Byzantine social attitudes, values and institutions.149 Byzantines regarded diplomacy as a form of war by other means: the Bureau of Barbarians was the first foreign intelligence agency, gathering information on the empire's rivals from every imaginable source.150 Byzantines availed themselves of a number of diplomatic practices. For example, embassies to the capital would often stay on for years. A member of other royal houses would routinely be requested to stay on in Constantinople, not only as a potential hostage, but also as a useful pawn in case political conditions where he came from changed. Another key practice was to overwhelm visitors by sumptuous displays.148 According to Dimitri Obolensky, the preservation of civilization in Eastern Europe was due to the skill and resourcefulness of Byzantine diplomacy, which remains one of Byzantium's lasting contributions to the history of Europe.151 Language For more details on this topic, see Medieval Greek. Left: The Mudil Psalter, the oldest complete psalter in the Coptic language Coptic Museum, Egypt, Coptic Cairo. Middle: The Codex Armenicus Rescriptus, a 6th/10th century parchment containing Armenian and Syriac liturgy The Schøyen Collection. Right: The Joshua Roll, a 10th century illuminated Greek manuscript probably made in Constantinople Vatican Library, Rome. Left: The Mudil Psalter, the oldest complete psalter in the Coptic language Coptic Museum, Egypt, Coptic Cairo. Middle: The Codex Armenicus Rescriptus, a 6th/10th century parchment containing Armenian and Syriac liturgy The Schøyen Collection. Right: The Joshua Roll, a 10th century illuminated Greek manuscript probably made in Constantinople Vatican Library, Rome. Left: The Mudil Psalter, the oldest complete psalter in the Coptic language Coptic Museum, Egypt, Coptic Cairo. Middle: The Codex Armenicus Rescriptus, a 6th/10th century parchment containing Armenian and Syriac liturgy The Schøyen Collection. Right: The Joshua Roll, a 10th century illuminated Greek manuscript probably made in Constantinople Vatican Library, Rome. Left: The Mudil Psalter, the oldest complete psalter in the Coptic language Coptic Museum, Egypt, Coptic Cairo. Middle: The Codex Armenicus Rescriptus, a 6th/10th century parchment containing Armenian and Syriac liturgy The Schøyen Collection. Right: The Joshua Roll, a 10th century illuminated Greek manuscript probably made in Constantinople Vatican Library, Rome. Owing its origins to Rome the original language of the Empire was Latin and this continued to be its official language until the 7th century AD when it was changed to Greek by Heraclius. Scholarly Latin would rapidly fall into disuse among the educated classes although the language would continue to be at least a ceremonial part of the Empire's culture for some time.152 Additionally common Latin continued to be a minority language in the Empire which many scholars believe gave birth to the Vlach languages.153 Apart from the Imperial court, though, the primary language used in the eastern Roman provinces i.e. the Eastern Roman Empire even before the decline of the Western Empire had always been Greek.154 Indeed early on in the life of the Roman Empire Greek had become the common language in the Christian Church, the language of scholarship and the arts, and, to a large degree, the lingua franca for trade between provinces and with other nations.155 The language itself for a time gained a dual nature with the primary spoken language, Koine, existing alongside an older literary language with Koine eventually evolving into the standard dialect.156 Many other languages existed in the multi-ethnic Empire as well, and some of these were given limited official status in their provinces at various times. Notably, by the beginning of the Middle Ages, Syriac and Aramaic had become more widely used by the educated classes in the far eastern provinces.157 Similarly Coptic, Armenian, and Georgian became significant among the educated in their provinces,158 and later foreign contacts made the Slavonic, Vlach, and Arabic languages important in the Empire and its sphere of influence.159 Aside from these, since Constantinople was a prime trading center in the Merranean region and beyond, virtually every known language of the Middle Ages was spoken in the Empire at some time, even Chinese.160 As the Empire entered its final decline the Empire's citizens became more culturally homogeneous and the Greek language became synonymous with their identity and their religion.161 Legacy As the only stable long-term state in Europe during the Middle Ages, Byzantium isolated Western Europe from newly emerging forces to the East. Constantly under attack, it distanced Western Europe from Persians, Arabs, Seljuk Turks, and for a time, the Ottomans. The Byzantine-Arab Wars, for example, are recognized by some historians as being a key factor behind the rise of Charlemagne,162 and a huge stimulus to feudalism and economic self-sufficiency. For centuries, Western historians have used the terms Byzantine and Byzantinism as bywords for decadence, duplicitous politics and complex bureaucracy, and there was a strongly negative assessment of Byzantine civilization and its legacy in Southeastern Europe.163 Byzantinism in general was defined as a body of religious, political, and philosophical ideas which ran contrary to those of the West.164 Similarly until the 20th century the term East, in the context of Eastern and Western culture, was commonly used to refer to cultures that had strong influences from the Byzantine Empire, often pejoratively including by extension the Arabs and the Ottomans. The 20th and 21st centuries, however, have seen attempts by historians in the West to understand the Empire in a more balanced and accurate fashion including its influences on the West, and as a result the complex character of Byzantine culture has received more attention and a more objective treatment than previously.164 See also List of Byzantine Empire-related topics References ^ Neubecker, Ottfried 1977. Le grand livre de l'héraldique. Elsevier Séquoïa: Brussels. ^ Corvisier, Andre 1994. A Dictionary of Military History and the Art of War. Blackwell Publishing. ^ A historiographical term used since at least the 18th century ^ Davies 1996, 245 Moravcsik 1970, 11-12 Lapidge 1998, 79 Winnifrith-Murray 1983, 113 ^ Fox, What, If Anything, Is a Byzantine? ^ a b c d Hellas, Byzantium. Encyclopaedia The Helios. ^ Bury 1923, 1 Fenner, Economic Factors ^ a b c Bury 1923, 1 ^ Byzantine Empire. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Gibbon 1906, II, 200PDF 2.61 MiB ^ Eusebius, IV, lxii ^ Gibbon 1906, III, 168PDF 2.35 MiB ^ Bury 1923, 1 Esler 2000, 1081 ^ Esler 2000, 1081 ^ Bury 1923, 25-26 ^ Esler 2000, 1081 Mousourakis 2003, 327-328 ^ Bury 1923, 163 ^ a b c d e f g h i Byzantine Empire. Encyclopaedia Britannica. ^ Nathan, Theodosius II 408-450 AD ^ Treadgold 1995, 193 ^ Alemany 2000, 207 Treadgold 1997, 184 ^ Treadgold 1997, 152-155 ^ Cameron 2000, 553 ^ Grierson 1999, 17 ^ Byzantine Empire. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Evans, Justinian AD 527-565 ^ a b c Evans, Justinian AD 527-565 ^ Bury 1923, 180-216 ^ Bury 1923, 236-258 ^ Bury 1923, 259-281 ^ Bury 1923, 286-288 ^ Procopius, IX ^ Vasiliev, The Legislative Work of Justinian and Tribonian ^ Vasiliev, The Ecclesiastical Policy of Justinian ^ Bray 2004, 19-47 Haldon 1997, 110-111 Treadgold 1997, 196-197 ^ Foss 1975, 722 ^ Haldon 1997, 41 Speck 1984, 178 ^ Haldon 1997, 42-43 ^ Grabar 1984, 37 Cameron 1979, 23 ^ Cameron 1979, 5-6, 20-22 ^ Haldon 1997, 46 Baynes 1912, passim Speck 1984, 178 ^ Foss 1975, 746-47 ^ Haldon 1997, 50 ^ Shahid 1972, 295-296, 305 ^ Haldon 1997, 404 ^ Haldon 1997, 49-50 ^ Haldon 1997, 61-62 ^ Haldon 1997, 102-14. ^ Haldon 1997, 208-215 Kaegi 2003, 236, 283 ^ Haldon 1997, 43-45, 66, 114-115 ^ Haldon 1997, 66-67 ^ Haldon 1997, 71 ^ Haldon 1997, 115-116 ^ Haldon 1997, 56-59 ^ Haldon 1997, 59-61 ^ Haldon 1997, 53, 61, 68-69, 74 ^ Haldon 1997, 70-78, 169-171 Haldon 2004, 216-217 Kountoura-Galake 1996, 62-75 ^ Cameron 1992 ^ Kitzinger 1976, 195 ^ Haldon 1997, 251 ^ Byzantine Empire. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Hellas, Byzantium. Encyclopaedia The Helios. ^ Garland 1996, 89 ^ Parry 1996, 11-15 ^ a b c d e f g h Norwich 1998 ^ Treadgold 1991 ^ Angold 1997 ^ Treadgold 1997, 548-549 ^ a b Markham, The Battle of Manzikert ^ Vasiliev, Relations with Italy and Western Europe ^ Byzantine Empire. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2002. Markham, The Battle of Manzikert ^ Magdalino 2002, 124 ^ Birkenmeier 2002 ^ Harris 2003 Read 2003, 124 Watson 1993, 12 ^ Anna Komnene, X, 261 ^ Anna Komnene, XI, 291 ^ Anna Komnene, XIII, 348-358 Birkenmeier 2002, 46 ^ a b Garland 2006, 126 Runciman 1982, 72 ^ a b Stone, John II Komnenos ^ Norwich 1998, 267 ^ Ostrogorsky 1990, 377 ^ Birkenmeier 2002, 90 ^ John II Komnenos. Encyclopaedia Britannica. ^ Harris 2003, 84 ^ Brooke 2004, 326 ^ Magdalino 2002, 74 Stone, Manuel I Comnenus ^ Sedlar 1994, 372 ^ Magdalino 2002, 67 ^ Innocent III, Letter to the Illustrious Emperor of Constantinople no 121 ^ Birkenmeier 2002, 128 ^ Birkenmeier 2002, 196 ^ Birkenmeier 2002, 185-186 ^ Birkenmeier 2002, 1 ^ Day 1977, 289-290 Harvey 1998 ^ Diehl, Byzantine Art ^ Tatakes-Moutafakis 2003, 110 ^ a b Vasiliev, Foreign policy of the Angeloi ^ Norwich 1998, 291 ^ a b Norwich 1998, 292 ^ a b c d e f P. Magdalino 2002, 194 ^ J.Harris 2003, 117 ^ Norwich 1998, 291 ^ Harris 2003, 118 ^ Norwich 1998, 293 ^ Norwich 1998, 294-295 ^ Norwich 1998, 296 ^ Madden 2005, 85 Norwich 1998, 297 ^ Angold 1997 Paparrigopoulos 1925, Db, 216 ^ Norwich 1998, 299 ^ a b c d The Fourth Crusade and the Latin Empire of Constantinople. Encyclopaedia Britannica. ^ Britannica Concise, Siege of Zara ^ Geoffrey of Villehardouin, 46 ^ a b Norwich 1998, 301 ^ Harris 2003 The Fourth Crusade and the Latin Empire of Constantinople. Encyclopaedia Britannica. ^ Innocent III, Innocent III to the Marquis of Montferrat and the Counts of Flanders, Blois and St. Pol. no 101 ^ Madden 2005, 110 ^ Paparrigopoulos 1925, Db, 230 ^ Choniates, The Sack of Constantinople ^ Norwich 1998 The Fourth Crusade and the Latin Empire of Constantinople. Encyclopaedia Britannica. ^ Kean 2005 Madden 2005, 162 Lowe-Baker, The Seljuks of Rum ^ Lowe-Baker, The Seljuks of Rum ^ Madden 2005, 179 Reinert 2002, 260 ^ Reinert 2002, 257 ^ Reinert 2002, 261 ^ Reinert 2002, 268 ^ Reinert 2002, 270 ^ Runciman 1990, 71-72 ^ a b Runciman 1990, 84-85 ^ Runciman 1990, 84-86 ^ Seton-Watson 1967, 31 ^ Magdalino in Laiou 2002, 532PDF 519 KiB ^ Matschke 2002, 805-806PDF 255 KiB ^ Laiou 2002, 723PDF 463 KiB ^ Laiou 2002, 3-4PDF 77.5 KiB ^ Anastos 1962, 409 ^ Cohen 1994, 395 Dickson, Mathematics Through the Middle Ages ^ King 1991, 116-118 ^ Robins 1993, 8 ^ Tatakes-Moutafakis 2003, 189 ^ Troianos-Velissaropoulou 1997, 340 ^ Raya, The Byzantine Church and Culture ^ Meyendorff 1982, 13 ^ Meyendorff 1982, 19 ^ Meyendorff 1982, 130 ^ Byzantine Art. Encyclopaedia Britannica. ^ Mango 1980, 233-4 ^ Byzantine Literature. Catholic Encyclopedia. ^ Louth 2005, 291 Neville 2004, 7 ^ Neville 2004, 34 ^ Neville 2004, 13 ^ a b Neumann 2006, 869-871 ^ Chrysos 1992, 35 ^ Antonucci 1993, 11-13 ^ Obolensky 1994, 3 ^ Apostolides 1992, 25-26 Wroth 1908, Introduction, section 6, cv ^ Saramandru, Torna, Torna Fratre Sedlar 1994, 403-404 ^ Millar 2006, 279 ^ Bryce 1901, 59 McDonnell 2006, 77 Millar 2006, 97-98 ^ Greek Language, Encyclopedia Britannica ^ Beaton 1996, 10 Jones 1986, 991 Versteegh 1977, Chapter 1 ^ Campbell 2004, 40 Hacikyan 2002, part 1 ^ Baynes 1907, 289 Gutas 1998, Chapter 7, section 4 Shopen 1987, 129 ^ Beckwith 1986, 171 Halsall 2006 ^ Greece during the Byzantine period c. AD 300-c. 1453, Population and languages, Emerging Greek identity, Encyclopedia Britannica Kaldellis 2008, Chapter 6 Nicol 1993, Chapter 5 ^ Pirenne, Henri Mediaeval Cities: Their Origins and the Rivival of Trade Princeton, NJ, 1925. ISBN 0691007608 See also Mohammed and Charlemagne London 1939 Dover Publications 2001. ISBN 0-486-42011-6. ^ Angelov 2001, 1 ^ a b Angelov 2001, 7-8 Sources Primary sources Anna Komnene. Books X-XIII, The Alexiad translated by Elizabeth A. S. Dawes. Medieval Sourcebook. Choniates, Nicetas 1912. The Sack of Constantinople 1204, Translations and Reprints from the Original Sources of European History by D.C. Munro Series 1, Vol 3:1. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 15-16. Eusebius. Life of Constantine Book IV. Christian Classics Ethereal Library. Geoffrey of Villehardouin 1963. The Conquest of Constantinople, Chronicles of the Crusades translated by Margaret R. Shaw. Penguin Classics. ISBN 0-140-44124-7. Innocent III 1993. in Othmar Hageneder, Christoph Egger, Karl Rudolf, and Andrea Sommerlechner: Die Register Innocenz' III. 5: 5. Pontifikatsjahr, 1202/1203, Texte. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Publikationen des Historischen Instituts beim Österreichischen Kulturinstitut in Rom. Innocent III 1995. in Othmar Hageneder, John C. Moore Andrea Sommerlechner, Christoph Egger and Herwig Weigl: Die Register Innocenz' III. 6: 6. Pontifikatsjahr, 1202/1203, Texte. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Publikationen des Historischen Instituts beim Österreichischen Kulturinstitut in Rom. Procopius 1935. Secret History translated by H. B. Dewing. Loeb Classical Library. Secondary sources Alemany, Agustí 2000. Byzantine Sources, Sources on the Alans: A Critical Compilation. BRILL. ISBN 9-004-11442-4. Anastos, Milton V. 1962. The History of Byzantine Science. Report on the Dumbarton Oaks Symposium of 1961. Dumbarton Oaks Papers 16: 409-411. doi:10.2307/1291170. ISSN 0070-7546. Retrieved on 2007-05-27. Angelov, Dimiter G. February 2001. The Making of Byzantinism: 1-10. Retrieved on 2007-06-07. Angold, Michael 1997. The Byzantine Empire, 1025-1204. Longman. ISBN 0-582-29468-1. Antonucci, Michael February 1993. War by Other Means: The Legacy of Byzantium. History Today 43 2: 11-13. ISSN 0018-2753. Retrieved on 2007-05-21. Apostolides, Evangelinus 1992. Greek lexicon of the Roman and Byzantine periods. Georg Olms Verlag. ISBN 3487057654. Baynes, Norman H. 1912. The restoration of the Cross at Jerusalem. The English Historical Review 27 106: 287-299. doi:10.1093/ehr/XXVII.CVI.287. ISSN 0013-8266. Baynes, Spencer 1907. Vlachs. Encyclopaedia Britannica: A Standard Work of Reference in Art, Literature, Science, History, Geography, Commerce, Biography, Discovery, and Invention. The Werner Company. Beaton, Roderick 1996. The Medieval Greek Romance. Routledge, 10. ISBN 0415120322. Beckwith, John 1986. Early Christian and Byzantine Art. Yale University Press. ISBN 0300052960. Birkenmeier, John W. 2002. The Campaigns of Manuel I Komnenos, The Development of the Komnenian Army: 1081-1180. Brill Academic Publishers. ISBN 9-004-11710-5. Bray, R.S. 2004. Justinian's Plague, Armies of Pestilence: The Impact of Disease on History. James Clarke Co. ISBN 0-227-17240-X. Bryce, James 1901. Roman and British Empires, Studies in History and Jurisprudence. H. Frowde. Brooke, Zachary Nugent 2004. East and West:1155-1198, A History of Europe, from 911 to 1198. Routledge UK. ISBN 0-415-22126-9. Bury, John Bagnall 1923. History of the Later Roman Empire. Macmillan Co., Ltd.. Byzantine Art. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2002. Byzantine Empire. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2002. Byzantine Literature. Catholic Encyclopedia. 1908. Campbell, George L. 2004. Compendium of the World's Languages. Taylor Francis. ISBN 0415202965. Cameron, Averil 1979. Images of Authority: Elites and Icons in Late Sixth-century Byzantium. Past and Present 84. doi:10.1093/past/84.1.3. Cameron, Averil 1992. New themes and styles in Greek literature, 7th and 8th centuries, in Averil Cameron and Lawrence I. Conrad: The Byzantine and Islamic Early Near East I: Problems in the Literary Source Material. Darwin Press. ISBN 0-878-50080-4. Cameron, Averil 2000. The Vandal Conquest and Vandal Rule, in Averil Cameron, Bryan Ward-Perkins and Michael Whitby: The Cambridge Ancient History. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-878-50080-4. Chrysos, Evangelos 1992. Byzantine Diplomacy, AD 300-800: Means and End, in Jonathan Shepard, Simon Franklin: Byzantine Diplomacy: Papers from the Twenty-Fourth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, Cambridge, March 1990 Society for the Promotion of Byzant. Variorum. ISBN 0-860-78338-3. Cohen, H. Floris 1994. The Emergence of Early Modern Science, The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-11280-2. Davies, Norman 1996. The Birth of Europe, Europe. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-198-20171-0. Day, Gerald W. Jun 1977. Manuel and the Genoese: A Reappraisal of Byzantine Commercial Policy in the Late Twelfth Century. The Journal of Economic History 37 2: 289-301. Retrieved on 2007-09-22. Dickson, Paul. Mathematics Through the Middle Ages 320-1660AD. Medieval mathematics. University of South Australia. Retrieved on 2008-04-01. Diehl, Charles. Manuel I Comnenus AD 1143-1180. Byzantium, An Introduction to East Roman Civilization. Myriobiblos - Library. Retrieved on 2007-05-18. Esler, Philip Francis 2000. Constantine and the Empire, The Early Christian World. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-33312-1. Evans, James Allan. Justinian AD 527-565. Online Encyclopedia of Roman Emperors. Retrieved on 2007-05-19. Fenner, Julian. To What Extent Were Economic Factors to Blame for the Deterioration of the Roman Empire in the Third Century A.D?. The Romans. Retrieved on 2007-05-25. Foss, Clive 1975. The Persians in Asia Minor and the End of Antiquity. The English Historical Review 90: 721-47. doi:10.1093/ehr/XC.CCCLVII.721. Fox, Clifton R. What, if Anything, Is a Byzantine. Online Encyclopedia of Roman Emperors. Retrieved on 2007-05-25. Garland, Lynda 1999. Byzantine Empresses: Women and Power in Byzantium, AD 527-1204. Routledge. ISBN 0415146887. Garland, Linda 2006. Middle Byzantine Family Values and Anna Komnene's Alexiad, Byzantine Women: Varieties of Experience 800-1200. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.. ISBN 0-754-65737-X. Gibbon, Edward 1906. in J.B. Bury with an Introduction by W.E.H. Lecky: The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire Volumes II, III, and IX. New York: Fred de Fau and Co.. Grabar, André 1984. L'iconoclasme Byzantin: le dossier archéologique. Flammarion. ISBN 2-08-081634-9. Grierson, Philip 1999. Byzantine Coinage. Dumbarton Oaks. ISBN 0-88402-274-9. Gutas, Dimitri 1998. Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement. ISBN 0415061326. Hacikyan, Agop Jack 2002. The Heritage of Armenian Literature. Wayne State University Press. ISBN 0814330231. Haldon, John 2002. Byzantium: A History. Tempus. ISBN 0-7524-2343-6. Haldon, John 1997. Byzantium in the Seventh Century: the Transformation of a Culture. Cambridge. ISBN 0-521-31917-X. Haldon, John 2003. Byzantium at War 600 - 1453. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-96861-5. Haldon, John 2004. The fate of the late Roman senatorial elite: extinction or transformation?, in John Haldon and Lawrence I. Conrad: The Byzantine and Early Islamic Near East VI: Elites old and new in the Byzantine and early Islamic Near East. Darwin Press. ISBN 0-87850-144-4. Halsall, Paul 2006. East Asian History Sourcebook: Chinese Accounts of Rome, Byzantium and the Middle East, c. 91 B.C.E. - 1643 C.E.. Fordham University. Retrieved on 2007-04-15. Harris, Jonathan 2003. Byzantium and the Crusades. Hambledon and London. ISBN 1-85285-298-4. Harvey, Alan 1989. Economic Expansion in the Byzantine Empire, 900-1200. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-37151-1. Hellas, Byzantium. Encyclopaedia The Helios. 1952. Herrin, Judith 2007. Byzantium: The Surprising Life of a Medieval Empire. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691131511. Greece during the Byzantine period c. AD 300-c. 1453, Population and languages, Emerging Greek identity. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2008. Hooker, Richard. The Byzantine Empire. Retrieved on 2007-06-07. Jenkins, Romilly 1987. Byzantium: The ImperialCenturies, AD 610-1071. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 0-802-06667-4. Jones, Arnold Hugh Martin 1986. The Later Roman Empire, 284-602: A Social Economic and Administrative Survey. JHU Press. ISBN 0801833531. John II Komnenos. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2002. Kaegi, Walter Emil 2003. Heraclius, Emperor of Byzantium. Cambridge. ISBN 0521814596. Kaldellis, Anthony 2008. Hellenism in Byzantium: The Transformations of Greek Identity and the Reception of the Classical Tradition. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521876885. Kean, Roger Michael 2005. Forgotten Power. Thalamus Publishing. ISBN 1-902-88607-0. King, David A. March 1991, Reviews: The Astronomical Works of Gregory Chioniades, Volume I: The Zij al- Ala'i by Gregory Chioniades, David Pingree; An Eleventh-Century Manual of Arabo-Byzantine Astronomy by Alexander Jones, Isis 821: 116-118 Kitzinger, Ernst 1976. Byzantine Art in the Period between Justinian and Iconoclasm, in W.E. Kleinbauer: The Art of Byzantium and the Medieval West: Selected Studies. Indiana University. ISBN 0-253-31055-5. Kountoura-Galake, Eleonora 1996. The Byzantine Clergy and the Society of Dark Ages in Greek. Institute of Byzantine Research. ISBN 9-789-60709-446-9. Laiou, Angeliki E. 2002. Exchange and Trade, Seventh-Twelfth Centuries, in Angeliki E. Laiou: The Economic History of Byzantium Volume 2. Dumbarton Oaks. Laiou, Angeliki E. 2002. Writing the Economic History of Byzantium, in Angeliki E. Laiou: The Economic History of Byzantium Volume 1. Dumbarton Oaks. Lapidge, Michael 1998. The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 0-631-22492-0. Louth, Andrew 2005. The Byzantine Empire in the Seventh Century, in Paul Fouracre: The New Cambridge Medieval History Volume I. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-36291-1. Lowe, Steven; Baker, Martin. The Seljuqs of Rum. Retrieved on 2007-07-09. Madden, Thomas F. 2005. Crusades: The Illustrated History. University of Michigan Press. ISBN 0-472-03127-9. Magdalino, Paul 2002. Medieval Constantinople: Built Environment and Urban Development, in Angeliki E. Laiou: The Economic History of Byzantium Volume 2. Dumbarton Oaks. Magdalino, Paul 2002. The Empire of Manuel I Komnenos, 1143-1180. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-52653-1. Mango, Cyril 1980. Byzantium: The Empire of the New Rome. Phoenix Press. ISBN 1-89880-044-8. Markham, Paul. The Battle of Manzikert: Military Disaster or Political Failure?. Retrieved on 2007-05-19. Matschke, Klaus-Peter 2002. Commerce, Trade, Markets, and Money: Thirteenth-Fifteenth Centuries, in Angeliki E. Laiou: The Economic History of Byzantium Volume 2. Dumbarton Oaks. McDonnell, Myles Anthony 2006. Hellinization and Arete: Semantic Borrowing, Roman Manliness: Virtus and the Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press. Meyendorff, John 1982. The Byzantine Legacy in the Orthodox Church. St Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 0-913-83690-7. Millar, Fergus 2006. A Greek Roman Empire: Power and Belief under Theodosius II 408-450. University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-24703-5. Moravcsik, Gyula 1970. Byzantium and the Magyars. Hakkert. Mousourakis, George 2003. The Dominate, The Historical and Institutional Context of Roman Law. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.. ISBN 0-754-62114-6. Nathan, Geoffrey S.. Roman Emperors: Theodosius II. Retrieved on 2007-01-10. Neumann, Iver. B. August 2006. Sublime Diplomacy: Byzantine, Early Modern, Contemporary. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34 3: 865-888. ISSN 1569-2981. Retrieved on 2007-05-21. Neubecker, Ottfried 1997. Heraldry: Sources, Symbols and Meaning. Time Warner Books UK. ISBN 0-316-64141-3. Neville, Leonora 2004. Imperial Administration and Byzantine Political Culture, Authority in Byzantine Provincial Society, 950-1100. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-83865-7. Nicol, Donald MacGillivray 1993. The Last Centuries of Byzantium, 1261-1453. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521439914. Norwich, John Julius 1998. A Short History of Byzantium. Penguin. ISBN 0-14-025960-0. Obolensky, Dimitri 1994. The Principles and Methods of Byzantine Diplomacy, Byzantium and the Slavs. St Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 0-881-41008-X. Ostrogorsky, Georg 1969. History of the Byzantine State. New Brunswick NJ. ISBN 0-8135-1198-4. Paparrigopoulos, Constantine; Karolidis, Pavlos 1925. History of the Hellenic Nation Volume Db in Greek. Eleftheroudakis. Parry, Kenneth 1996. Historical Introduction, Depicting the Word: Byzantine Iconophile Thought of the Eighth and Ninth Centuries. Brill Academic Publishers. ISBN 9-004-10502-6. Raya, Joseph. The Byzantine Church and Culture. Retrieved on 2007-06-02. Read, Piers Paul 2003-English ion 1999. The Templars translated in Greek by G. Kousounelou. Enalios. ISBN 9-605-36143-4. Reinert, Stephen W. 2002. Fragmentation 1204-1453, in Cyril Mango: The Oxford History of Byzantium. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19814-098-3. Robins, Robert Henry 1993. The Byzantine Grammarians: Their Place in History. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 3-110-13574-4. Runciman, Steven 1982. The Bogomils, The Medieval Manichee: A Study of the Christian Dualist Heresy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-28926-2. Runciman, Steven 1990. The Fall of Constantinople, 1453. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-39832-0. Ryan, Herbert J. 1993. The Church in History, The College Student's Introduction to Theology. Liturgical Press. ISBN 0-814-65841-5. Saramandru, Nicolae. Torna, Torna Fratre in Romanian. ura Academiei Române. Retrieved on 2007-04-25. Sedlar, Jean W. 1994. Foreign Affairs, East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000-1500. University of Washington Press. ISBN 0-295-97290-4. Seton-Watson, Hugh 1967. The Church, The Russian Empire, 1801-1917. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-198-22152-5. Shahid, Irfan 1972. The Iranian factor in Byzantium during the reign of Heraclius. Dumbarton Oaks Papers 26: 293-320. doi:10.2307/1291324. Shopen, Timothy 1987. Languages and Their Status. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 0812212495. Speck, Paul 1984. Ikonoklasmus und die Anfänge der Makedonischen Renaissance, Varia 1 Poikila Byzantina 4. Rudolf Halbelt, 175-210. Stone, Andrew. John II Komnenos AD 1118-1143. Online Encyclopedia of Roman Emperors. Retrieved on 2007-05-18. Stone, Andrew. Manuel I Komnenos AD 1143-1180. Online Encyclopedia of Roman Emperors. Retrieved on 2007-02-05. Siege of Zara. Encyclopaedia Britannica Concise. Retrieved on 2007-05-18. Tatakes, Vasileios N.; Moutafakis, Nicholas J. 2003. Byzantine Philosophy. Hackett Publishing. ISBN 0-872-20563-0. The Fourth Crusade and the Latin Empire of Constantinople. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2002. Treadgold, Warren 1995. The Army and the State, Byzantium and Its Army, 284-1081. Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-804-73163-2. Treadgold, Warren 1997. A History of the Byzantine State and Society. Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-804-72630-2. Treadgold, Warren 1991. The Byzantine Revival, 780-842. Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-804-71896-2. Troianos, Spyros; Velissaropoulou-Karakosta, Julia 1997. Byzantine Law, History of Law. Ant.N. Sakkoulas Publishers. ISBN 9-602-32594-1. Vasiliev, Alexander Alexandrovich 1928-1935. Byzantium and the Crusades, History of the Byzantine Empire. Versteegh, Cornelis H. M. 1977. 1, Greek Elements in Arabic Linguistic Thinking. ISBN 9004048553. Watson, Bruce Allen 1993. Jerusalem 1099, Sieges: A Comparative Study. Praeger/Greenwood. ISBN 0-275-94034-9. Williams, Stephen 1999. Jerusalem 1099, The Rome that Did Not Fall: The Survival of the East in the Fifth Century. Routledge. ISBN 0415154030. Winnifrith, Tom; Murray, Penelope 1983. Greece Old and New. Macmillan. ISBN 0-333-27836-4. Wroth, Warwick 1908. Catalogue of the Imperial Byzantine Coins in the British Museum. British Museum Dept. of Coins and Medals. Further reading Byzantine Empire portal Ahrweiler, Helene Studies on the Internal Diaspora of the Byzantine Empire, Harvard University Press, 1998. Ahrweiler, Helene Les Europeens, Herman Paris, 2000. Haldon, John 2001. The Byzantine Wars: Battles and Campaigns of the Byzantine Era. ISBN 0-7524-1795-9. J.M. Hussey, The Cambridge Medieval History, Volume IV - The Byzantine Empire Part I, Byzantium and its Neighbors, Cambridge University Press 1966. Runciman, Steven 1966. Byzantine Civilisation. Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd.. ISBN 1-56619-574-8. Runciman, Steven 1990. The Emperor Romanus Lecapenus and his Reign. Toynbee, Arnold J. 1972. Constantine Porphyrogenitus and His World. Oxford University Press. ISBN 019215253X. External links Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Byzantine Empire Byzantine studies, resources and bibliography Byzantine studies homepage at Dumbarton Oaks. Includes links to numerous electronic texts. Byzantium: Byzantine studies on the Internet. Links to various online resources. Translations from Byzantine Sources: The Imperial Centuries, c. 700-1204. Online sourcebook, maintained by Paul Stephenson. De Re Militari. Resources for medieval military history, including numerous translated sources on the Byzantine wars. Medieval sourcebook: Byzantium. Numerous primary sources on Byzantine history. Bibliography on Byzantine Material Culture and Daily Life. Hosted by the University of Vienna; in English. Constantinople Home Page. Links to texts, images and videos on Byzantium. Miscellaneous De Imperatoribus Romanis. Scholarly biographies of many Byzantine emperors. The Fall of the Empire. Byzantine Lesson 2007. Russian: Гибель империи. Византий�?кий урок The movie explicating the political and economical reasons for the fall of the Byzantine Empire, filmed by Russian Orthodox Church. 12 Byzantine Rulers by Lars Brownworth of The Stony Brook School; audio lectures. NYTimes review. 18 centuries of Roman Empire by Howard Wiseman Maps of the Roman/Byzantine Empire throughout its lifetime v d e Ancient Rome topics Timeline Epochs Foundation · Monarchy · Republic · Empire · Principate · Dominate · Decline · Western Empire / Eastern Empire Constitution History · Constitution of the Kingdom / the Republic / the Empire / the Late Empire · Senate · Legislative assemblies · Executive magistrates Government Curia · Forum · Cursus honorum · Collegiality · Emperor · Legatus · Dux · Officium · Praefectus · Vicarius · Vigintisexviri · Lictor · Magister militum · Imperator · Princeps senatus · Pontifex Maximus · Augustus · Caesar · Tetrarch · Province Magistrates Ordinary Tribune · Quaestor · Aedile · Praetor · Consul · Censor · Promagistrate · Governor Extraordinary Dictator · Magister Equitum · Decemviri · Consular Tribune · Triumvirate · Rex Law Twelve Tables · Roman citizenship · Auctoritas · Imperium · Status · Litigation Military Borders · Establishment · Structure · Campaigns · Technology · Political control · Frontiers and fortifications Castra · Strategy · Engineering · Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines · Navy Fleet · Auxiliaries · Decorations and punishments Society Theatre · Social class · Cuisine · Education · Literature · Art · Music · Architecture · Religion Funeral Persecution Imperial cult · Mythology · Forum · SPQR · Technology · Engineering · Calendar · Clothing · Festivals · Circus · Wine · Women · Marriage · Slavery · Deforestation Economy Agriculture · Commerce · Finance · Currency · Republican currency · Imperial currency Language Latin History · Literature · Romance languages Versions Old · Classical · Vulgar · Medieval · Renaissance · New · Recent · Ecclesiastical Lists Topics · Wars · Battles · Generals · Legions · Emperors · Triumphal arches · Geographers · Institutions · Laws · Consuls · Distinguished women Portal v d e Middle Ages by region Armenia · Bosnia · Britain · Bulgaria · Byzantine Empire · Croatia · Crusader states · Czech lands · France · Germany · Italy · Kievan Rus' · Poland · Romania · Scotland · Serbia · Spain v d e History of Christianity Jesus the Apostles Background Timeline Ministry Good News Death Resurrection Holy Spirit Gospels Acts Apostolic Age The 12 Paul Jerusalem Council Ante-Nicene Church History Of Apostolic Fathers Ignatius Persecutions Justin Martyr Church Fathers Irenaeus Marcionism NT Canon Tertullian Montanism Origen Christian Roman Empire Constantine Monasticism Councils: Nicaea I Athanasius Arianism Constantinople I Nicene Creed Jerome Augustine Ephesus Chalcedon Eastern Christianity History Of History of E. Orthodoxy Asia Oriental Orxy. Coptic Syria Armenia Chrysostom Islam Icon East-West Schism Fall Russian Middle Ages Pelagianism Gregory I Celtic Germanic Scandinavian Investiture Anselm of Canterbury Abelard Bernard of Clairvaux Crusades Inquisition Scholasticism Dominic Francis of Assisi 4th Lateran Bonaventure Thomas Aquinas Wycliffe Avignon Papal Schism Jan Hus Conciliarism Protestant Reformation Protestantism, History of Erasmus Five Solas Eucharistic Theologies Calvinist v. Arminian Arminianism Synod of Dort European Colonization Lutheranism, History of Martin Luther, Theology 95 Theses Diet of Worms Eucharist Melanchthon Book of Concord Lutheran Orthodoxy Reformed Zwinglianism In Switzerland John Calvin History of Calvinism John Knox TULIP Synod of Dort Anabaptism Radical Reformation Conrad Grebel Swiss Brethren Müntzer Menno Simons English Reformation: History, Timeline Henry VIII Cranmer Elizabethan Settlement 39 Articles Book of Common Prayer In Scotland Civil War Roman Catholicism History of the Papacy Lateran IV Trent Counter-Reformation Thomas More Leo X Guadalupe Jesuits Francis Xavier Dissolution of the Monasteries Paul III Pius V Tridentine Mass Teresa of Avila Bellarmine Oratory of Neri Vatican I Vatican II Roman Catholic Timeline Age of Reason Revival 17th century denominations in England Adventism Baptists Congregationalism First Great Awakening History of Jehovah's Witnesses History of the Anglican Communion History of the Latter Day Saint movement History of the Seventh-day Adventist Church Latter Day Saint movement Methodism Millerites Neo-Lutheranism Pietism Puritanism English Civil War Wars of Religion Restoration Movement Restorationism Revivalism Industrial Age Camp meeting Holiness movement Independent Catholic Churches Second Great Awakening Age of Ideologies Azusa Street Revival Ecumenism Evangelicalism Jesus movement Mainline Protestant Pentecostalism Charismatic movement Christianity Christianity Timeline Christian Theology Christian Martyrs Timeline of Christian missions - History of: Eastern Orthodox Church Protestantism Roman Catholic Church v d e History of Anatolia v d e A History of Empires Ancient empires Akkadian Empire · Ancient Egypt · Neo-Assyrian Empire · Hittite Empire · Achaemenid Persian Empire · Athenian Empire · Macedonian Empire Ptolemaic Empire · Seleucid Empire · Carthaginian Empire · Maurya Indian Empire · Gupta Indian Empire · Qin Chinese Empire · Han Chinese Empire · Roman Empire Western Roman Empire · Eastern Roman Empire · Sassanid Persian Empire Medieval empires Byzantine Empire · Hunnic Empire · Arab Empire Rashidun Empire · Umayyad Empire · Abbasid Empire · Fatimid Empire · Almohad Empire · Ghaznavid Empire · Great Seljuq Empire · Khwarezmian Empire · Timurid Empire · Chola Indian Empire · Mongol Empire · Serbian Empire · Bulgarian Empire · Carolingian Empire · Holy Roman Empire · Angevin Empire · Mali Empire · Tang Chinese Empire · Song Chinese Empire · Yuan Chinese Empire · Inca Empire Modern empires Mughal Indian Empire · Ming Chinese Empire · Qing Chinese Empire · Ottoman Empire · Safavid Persian Empire · Ethiopian Empire · Portuguese Empire · Spanish Empire · Iberian Union Empire · Dutch Empire · British Empire · French Napoleonic Empire · French Colonial Empire · German Empire · German Colonial Empire · Russian Empire · Swedish Empire · Austro-Hungarian Empire · Brazilian Empire Featured article Retrieved from http://en..org/wiki/Byzantine_Empire Categories: Former countries in Europe | Former countries in Asia | Former countries in Africa | Former empires | Former monarchies of Europe | Former monarchies of Asia | Former monarchies of Africa | 330 establishments | 1453 disestablishments | Featured articles | Byzantine Empire Views Article Discussion this page History Personal tools Log in / create account Navigation Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Search Go Search Interaction Community portal Recent changes Contact Donate to Help Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link Cite this page Languages العربية Aragonés Asturianu Azərbaycan বাংলা Белару�?ка�? Белару�?ка�? тарашкевіца Bosanski Brezhoneg Българ�?ки Català Cebuano Česky Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara �?ارسی Français Gàidhlig Galego 한국어 Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Иронау �?slenska Italiano עברית ქ�?რთული Қазақша Kiswahili Kurdî / كوردی Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Македон�?ки Malti मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nederlands नेपाल भाषा 日本語 ‪Norsk bokmål‬ ‪Norsk nynorsk‬ Polski Português Qırımtatarca Română Ру�?�?кий Sicilianu Simple English Sloven�?ina Slovenš�?ina Срп�?ки / Srpski Srpskohrvatski / Срп�?кохрват�?ки Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ�? ไทย Tiếng Việt Türkçe Україн�?ька اردو Vèneto 粵語 Zazaki Žemaitėška 中文 This page was last modified on 13 September 2008, at 01:11

Videos and Links

39 Reasons to Drink Acai Juice Every Day
What is MonaVie - Watch the 8-minute video
Discovering MonaVie Video
The Power of You Video
Effects of MonaVie Active on Antioxidant Capacity in Humans
Log into your Wholesale MonaVie Account

Why Drink MonaVie?

So many of us do not eat a balanced diet, get enough sleep, have too much stress, or are impacted with toxins and pollutants. Drinking 2 ounces of MonaVie twice a day will help your body detoxify as well as build your immune system. Its the smartest thing you can do for yourself, so start today. Buying MonaVie through our company guarantees you support 7 days a week and, if you would like to share MonaVie with your family and friends we will guide you from start to finish.

The Best Way to Buy MonaVie is Wholesale

1. Click on Enroll Now (30 - 55% off retail price)
2. Pay $39 for your Wholesale ID number.
3. NO minimum order required.
4. MonaVie is delivered to your door in 3 to 5 days.

Sierra Acai Company

Shop Online

Enroll Now

Friends

News

News About Byzantine_Empire

Videos and Links

Why Drink MonaVie?

The Best Way to Buy MonaVie is Wholesale