Buy Wholesale and maintain an Active status for 2 months and we will refund your $39 Distributor Fee![]()
14-September-2008 12:50:29 - anthropology November 2006 Cultural anthropology is one of four fields of anthropology the holistic study of humanity as it developed in the United States. It is the branch of anthropology that has developed and promoted culture as a meaningful scientific concept, studied cultural variation among humans, and examined the impact of global economic and political processes on local cultural realities. The anthropological concept of culture reflects in part a reaction against earlier Western discourses based on an opposition between culture and nature, according to which some human beings lived in a state of nature. Anthropologists have argued that culture is human nature, and that all people have a capacity to classify experiences, encode classifications symbolically i.e. in language, and teach such abstractions to others. Since humans acquire culture through the learning processes of enculturation and socialization, people living in different places or different circumstances develop different cultures. Anthropologists have also pointed out that through culture people can adapt to their environment in non-genetic ways, so people living in different environments will often have different cultures. Much of anthropological theory has originated in an appreciation of and interest in the tension between the local particular cultures and the global a universal human nature, or the web of connections between people in distinct places/circumstances. Parallel with the rise of cultural anthropology in the United States, social anthropology, in which sociality is the central concept and which focuses on the study of social statuses and roles, groups, institutions, and the relations among them, developed as an academic discipline in Britain. An umbrella term socio-cultural anthropology makes reference to both cultural and social anthropology traditions. Contents 1 A brief history 2 Contemporary theory and methods 3 Related topics 4 See also 5 External links A brief history Modern cultural anthropology has its origins in, and developed in reaction to, 19th century ethnology, which involves the organized comparison of human societies. Scholars like E.B. Tylor and J.G. Frazer in England worked mostly with materials collected by others - usually missionaries, explorers, or colonial officials - this earned them their current sobriquet of arm-chair anthropologists. Ethnologists had an special interest in why people living in different parts of the world sometimes had similar beliefs and practices. In addressing this question, ethnologists in the 19th century divided into two schools of thought. Some, like Grafton Elliot Smith, argued that different groups must somehow have learned from one another, however indirectly; in other words, they argued that cultural traits spread from one place to another, or diffused. Other ethnologists argued that different groups had the capability of inventing similar beliefs and practices independently. Some of those who advocated independent invention, like Lewis Henry Morgan, additionally supposed that similarities meant that different groups had passed through the same stages of cultural evolution See also classical social evolutionism. 20th century anthropologists largely reject the notion that all human societies must pass through the same stages in the same order. Some 20th century ethnologists, like Julian Steward, have instead argued that such similarities reflected similar adaptations to similar environments see cultural evolution. Others, like Claude Lévi-Strauss who was influenced both by American cultural anthropology and by French Durkheimian sociology, have argued that apparent patterns of development reflect fundamental similarities in the structure of human thought see structuralism. In the 20th century most cultural and social anthropologists turned to the study of ethnography, in which an anthropologist actually lives among another society for a considerable period of time, simultaneously participating in and observing the social and cultural life of the group. BronisÅ‚aw Malinowski who conducted fieldwork in the Trobriand Islands and taught in England developed this method, and Franz Boas who conducted fieldwork in Baffin Island and taught in the United States promoted it. Boas's students drew on his conception of culture and cultural relativism to develop cultural anthropology in the United States. Simultaneously, Malinowski and A.R. Radcliffe Brown´s students were developing social anthropology in the United Kingdom. Whereas cultural anthropology focused on symbols and values, social anthropology focused on social groups and institutions. Today socio-cultural anthropologists attend to all these elements. Although 19th century ethnologists saw diffusion and independent invention as mutually exclusive and competing theories, most ethnographers quickly reached a consensus that both processes occur, and that both can plausibly account for cross-cultural similarities. But these ethnographers pointed out the superficiality of many such similarities, and that even traits that spread through diffusion often changed their meaning and functions as they moved from one society to another. Accordingly, these anthropologists showed less interest in comparing cultures, generalizing about human nature, or discovering universal laws of cultural development, than in understanding particular cultures in those cultures' own terms. Such ethnographers and their students promoted the idea of cultural relativism, the view that one can only understand another person's beliefs and behaviors in the context of the culture in which he or she lived. In the early 20th century socio-cultural anthropology developed in different forms in Europe and in the United States. European social anthropologists focused on observed social behaviors and on social structure, that is, on relationships among social roles e.g. husband and wife, or parent and child and social institutions e.g. religion, economy, and politics. American cultural anthropologists focused on the ways people expressed their view of themselves and their world, especially in symbolic forms such as art and myths. These two approaches frequently converged kinship, for example, and leadership function both as symbolic systems and as social institutions, and generally complemented one another. Today almost all socio-cultural anthropologists refer to the work of both sets of predecessors, and have an equal interest in what people do and in what people say. Contemporary theory and methods Today ethnography continues to dominate socio-cultural anthropology. Nevertheless, many contemporary socio-cultural anthropologists have rejected earlier models of ethnography which they claim treated local cultures as bounded and isolated. These anthropologists continue to concern themselves with the distinct ways people in different locales experience and understand their lives, but they often argue that one cannot understand these particular ways of life solely from a local perspective; they instead combine a focus on the local with an effort to grasp larger political, economic, and cultural frameworks that impact local lived realities. Notable proponents of this approach include Arjun Appadurai, James Clifford, George Marcus, Sidney Mintz, Michael Taussig and Eric Wolf. A growing trend in anthropological research and analysis seems to be the use of multi-sited ethnography, discussed in George Marcus's article Ethnography In/Of the World System: the Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Looking at culture as embedded in macro-constructions of a global social order, multi-sited ethnography uses traditional methodology in various locations both spatially and temporally. Through this methodology greater insight can be gained when examining the impact of world-systems on local and global communities. Also emerging in multi-sited ethnography are greater interdisciplinary approaches to fieldwork, bringing in methods from cultural studies, media studies, science and technology studies, and others. In multi-sited ethnography research tracks a subject across spatial and temporal boundaries. For example, a multi-sited ethnography may follow a thing, such as a particular commodity, as it transfers through the networks of global capitalism. Multi-sited ethnography may also follow ethnic groups in diaspora, stories or rumours that appear in multiple locations and in multiple time periods, metaphors that appear in multiple ethnographic locations, or the biographies of individual people or groups as they move through space and time. It may also follow conflicts that transcend boundaries. Multi-sited ethnographies, such as Nancy Scheper-Hughes's ethnography of the international black market for the trade of human organs. In this research she follows organs as they transfer through various legal and illegal networks of capitalism, as well as the rumours and urban legends that circulate in impoverished communities about child kidnapping and organ theft. Sociocultural anthropologists have increasingly turned their investigative eye on to Western culture. For example, Philippe Bourgois won the Margaret Mead Award in 1997 for In Search of Respect, a study of the entrepreneurs in a Harlem crack-den. Also growing more popular are ethnographies of professional communities, such as laboratory researchers, Wall Street investors, law firms, or IT computer employees 1. Related topics Anthropology of art Anthropology of media Anthropology of religion Applied anthropology Cross-cultural studies Cyber anthropology Development anthropology Dual inheritance theory Environmental anthropology Economic anthropology Ecological anthropology Ethnobotany Ethnography Ethnomusicology Ethnozoology Evolutionary anthropology Feminist anthropology Human behavioral ecology Medical anthropology Psychological anthropology Political anthropology Public anthropology Social anthropology Symbolic anthropology Urban anthropology Visual anthropology See also Community studies Dual inheritance theory Ernest Gellner Human behavioral ecology Hunter-gatherers Intangible Cultural Heritage Neuroanthropology Nomads Sociology Symbolic anthropology External links http://www.movinganthropology.org - The Moving Anthropology Student Network-website offers tutorials, information on the subject, discussion-forums and a large link-collection for all interested scholars of cultural anthropology Review of Nettl's 2005 revised ion of The Study of Ethnomusicology This article relating to anthropology is a stub. Retrieved from http://en..org/wiki/Cultural_anthropology Categories: Cultural anthropology | Anthropology stubsHidden categories: Articles lacking sources from November 2006 | All articles lacking sources Views Article Discussion this page History Personal tools Log in / create account Navigation Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Search Go Search Interaction Community portal Recent changes Contact Donate to Help Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link Cite this page Languages العربية Avañe'ẽ БеларуÑ?каÑ? тарашкевіца Bosanski Català Česky Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Furlan Ã?slenska Italiano עברית Limburgs Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Polski Português SlovenÄ?ina СрпÑ?ки / Srpski Suomi தமிழà¯? Türkçe 䏿–‡ This page was last modified on 13 September 2008, at 01:28
39 Reasons to Drink Acai Juice Every Day
What is MonaVie - Watch the 8-minute video
Discovering MonaVie Video
The Power of You Video
Effects of MonaVie Active on Antioxidant Capacity in Humans
Log into your Wholesale MonaVie Account
So many of us do not eat a balanced diet, get enough sleep, have too much stress, or are impacted with toxins and pollutants. Drinking 2 ounces of MonaVie twice a day will help your body detoxify as well as build your immune system. Its the smartest thing you can do for yourself, so start today. Buying MonaVie through our company guarantees you support 7 days a week and, if you would like to share MonaVie with your family and friends we will guide you from start to finish.
1. Click on Enroll Now (30 - 55% off retail price)
2. Pay $39 for your Wholesale ID number.
3. NO minimum order required.
4. MonaVie is delivered to your door in 3 to 5 days.