Buy Wholesale and maintain an Active status for 2 months and we will refund your $39 Distributor Fee![]()
07-SEPTEMBER-2008 03:17:44 - Discrimination August 2008 This article or section has multiple issues. Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk page. Its neutrality is disputed. Tagged since December 2007. It may not present a worldwide view of the subject. Tagged since May 2008. Part of a series of articles on Discrimination General forms Racism · Sexism · Ageism Religious intolerance · Reverse discrimination · Xenophobia Specific forms Social Ableism · Adultism · Biphobia · Classism Elitism · Ephebiphobia · Gerontophobia Heightism · Heterosexism · Heterophobia Homophobia · Lesbophobia · Lookism Misandry · Misogyny · Pediaphobia · Sizeism · Transphobia Against ethnic groups American · Arab · Armenian Australian · Blacks · Canadian · Catalan Chinese · English · European · French German · Igbo · Indian · Iranian · Irish Italian · Japanese · Jewish Malay · Mexican · Native Americans Polish · Portuguese · Quebec · Roma Romanian · Russian · Scottish Serbian · Spanish · Turkish · Whites Asian fetish Against beliefs Atheism · Bahá'à · Catholicism Christianity · Hinduism · Judaism Mormonism · Islam · Neopaganism Protestantism New religious movements Manifestations Slavery · Racial profiling · Lynching Hate speech · Hate crime Genocide examples · Ethnocide Ethnic cleansing · Pogrom · Race war Religious persecution · Blood libel Paternalism · Police brutality Movements Discriminatory Aryanism · Hate groups · Ku Klux Klan Neo-Nazism · American Nazi Party South African National Party Supremacism Anti-discriminatory Abolitionism · Civil rights Women's / Universal suffrage LGBT rights · Feminism Masculism · Men's / Fathers' rights Children's rights · Youth rights Disability rights Inclusion Autistic rights Policies Discriminatory Race Religion Sex segregation Apartheid · Group rights · Redlining Internment · Ethnocracy Numerus clausus · Ghetto benches Anti-discriminatory Emancipation · Civil rights Desegregation · Integration Equal opportunity · Gender equality Counter-discriminatory Affirmative action · Group rights Racial quota · Reservation India Reparation · Forced busing Employment equity Canada Black Economic Empowerment BEE Law Discriminatory Anti-miscegenation · Anti-immigration Alien and Sion Acts · Jim Crow laws Test Act · Apartheid laws Ketuanan Melayu · Nuremberg Laws Diyya Anti-discriminatory Anti-discrimination acts Anti-discrimination law 14th Amendment · Crime of apartheid Other forms Adultcentrism · Androcentrism · Colorism Cronyism · Ethnocentrism · Economic Genism · Gynocentrism · Linguicism Nepotism · Triumphalism Related topics Afrocentrism · American exceptionalism Bigotry · Black supremacy Diversity · Eugenics · Eurocentrism Multiculturalism · Oppression Political correctness · Prejudice Racialism · Reverse discrimination Stereotype · Supremacism Tolerance and intolerance Discrimination Portal This box: view talk Unlike discrimination between, which is the discernment of qualities and recognition of the differences, focused here discrimination against is the prejudicial treatment of a person or a group of people based on certain characteristics. It can be positive, prejudicial behavior directed towards a certain group, or negative, behavior directed against a certain group. The latter is the most common meaning, i.e. negative discrimination. Discrimination on grounds such as race or religion, is generally illegal in most Western societies, while discriminating between people on the grounds of merit is usually lawful. The latter is more commonly referred to is differentiating. When unlawful discrimination takes place, it is often described as discrimination against a person or group of people. Contents 1 Direct vs. subtle 2 Race discrimination 3 Age discrimination 4 Sex discrimination 4.1 Legislation 5 Caste discrimination 6 Employment discrimination 7 Language discrimination 8 Reverse discrimination and affirmative action 9 Disability discrimination 10 Theories 10.1 Discriminaccion 10.2 Conservative and Anarcho-Capitalist 11 References 12 See also 13 External links Direct vs. subtle Unlawful discrimination can be characterized as direct or subtle. Direct discrimination involves treating someone less favorably because of their possession of an attribute e.g., sex, age, race, religion, family status, national origin, military status, sexual orientation, disability, body size/shape, compared with someone without that attribute in the same circumstances. An example of direct discrimination would be not offering a job to a woman because she is likely to take maternity leave whereas a man is not. Indirect or subtle discrimination involves setting a condition or requirement which a smaller proportion of those with the attribute are able to comply with, without reasonable justification. The U.S. case of Griggs v. Duke Power Company2 provides an example of indirect discrimination, where an aptitude test used in job applications was found to disqualify Negroes at a substantially higher rate than white applicants. Race discrimination Racial discrimination differentiates between individuals on the basis of real and perceived racial differences, and has been official government policy in several countries, such as South Africa in the apartheid era, and the USA. In the United States, racial profiling of minorities by law enforcement officials has been called racial discrimination.1 As early as 1865, the Civil Rights Act provided a remedy for intentional race discrimination in employment by private employers and state and local public employers. The Civil Rights Act of 1871 applies to public employment or employment involving state action prohibiting deprivation of rights secured by the federal constitution or federal laws through action under color of law. Title VII is the principal federal statute with regard to employment discrimination prohibiting unlawful employment discrimination by public and private employers, labor organizations, training programs and employment agencies based on race or color, religion, gender, and national origin. Title VII also prohibits retaliation against any person for opposing any practice forbidden by statute, or for making a charge, testifying, assisting, or participating in a proceeding under the statute. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 expanded the damages available in Title VII cases and granted Title VII plaintiffs the right to a jury trial. Title VII also provides that race and color discrimination against every race and color is prohibited. In the UK the inquiry following the murder of Stephen Lawrence accused the police of institutional racism. Weaver v NATFHE now part of the UCU Race/sex discrimination case. An Industrial Employment Tribunal in the UK in 1987 decided that a trade union was justified in not assisting a Black woman member, complaining of racist/sexist harassment, regardless of the merits of the case, because the accused male would lose his job. The Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld the decision, which still stands today as the definitive legal precedent in this field. Also known as the Bournville College Racial Harassment issue. Age discrimination Age discrimination is discrimination against a person or group on the grounds of age. Although theoretically the word can refer to the discrimination against any age group, age discrimination usually comes in one of three forms: discrimination against youth also called adultism, discrimination against those 40 years old or older 3, and discrimination against elderly people. In the United States, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act prohibits employment discrimination nationwide based on age with respect to employees 40 years of age or older. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act also addresses the difficulty older workers face in obtaining new employment after being displaced from their jobs, arbitrary age limits. In many countries, companies more or less openly refuse to hire people above a certain age despite the increasing lifespans and average age of the population. The reasons for this range from vague feelings that younger people are more dynamic and create a positive image for the company, to more concrete concerns about regulations granting older employees higher salaries or other benefits without these expenses being fully justified by an older employees' greater experience. Some people consider that teenagers and youth around 15-25 years old are victims of adultism, age discrimination framed as a paternalistic form of protection. In seeking social justice, they feel that it is necessary to remove the use of a false moral agenda in order to achieve agency and empowerment. This perspective is based on the grounds that youth should be treated more respectfully by adults and not as second-class citizens. Some suggest that social stratification in age groups causes outsiders to incorrectly stereotype and generalize the group, for instance that all adolescents are equally immature, violent or rebellious, listen to rock tunes, and do drugs. Some have organized groups against age discrimination. Ageism is the causal effect of a continuum of fears related to age.citation needed This continuum includes: Pediaphobia: the fear of infants or small children. Ephebiphobia: the fear of youth. Gerontophobia: the fear of elderly people. Related terms include: Adultism: Also called adultarchy, adult privilege, and adultcentrism/adultocentrism, this is the wielding of authority over young people and the preference of adults before children and youth. Jeunism: Also called youthism is the holding of beliefs or actions taken that preference 'younger' people before adults. Sex discrimination See also: Sexism Though sexism refers to beliefs and attitudes in relation to the gender of a person, such beliefs and attitudes are of a social nature and do not, normally, carry any legal consequences. Sex discrimination, on the other hand, may have legal consequences. Though what constitutes sex discrimination varies between countries, the essence is that it is an adverse action taken by one person against another person that would not have occurred had the person been of another sex. Discrimination of that nature in certain enumerated circumstances is illegal in many countries. Currently, discrimination based on sex is defined as adverse action against another person, that would not have occurred had the person been of another sex. This is considered a form of prejudice and is illegal in certain enumerated circumstances in most countries. Sexual discrimination can arise in different contexts. For instance an employee may be discriminated against by being asked discriminatory questions during a job interview, or because an employer did not hire, promote or wrongfully terminated an employee based on his or her gender, or employers pay unequally based on gender. In an educational setting there could be claims that a student was excluded from an educational institution, program, opportunity, loan, student group, or scholarship due to his or her gender. In the housing setting there could be claims that a person was refused negotiations on seeking a house, contracting/leasing a house or getting a loan based on his or her gender. Another setting where there have been claims of gender discrimination is banking; for example if one is refused cr or is offered unequal loan terms based on one's gender.citation needed Another setting where there is usually gender discrimination is when one is refused to extend his or her cr, refused approval of cr/loan process, and if there is a burden of unequal loan terms based on one's gender. Socially, sexual differences have been used to justify different roles for men and women, in some cases giving rise to claims of primary and secondary roles.citation needed While there are non-physical differences between men and women, there is little agreement as to what those differences are.citation needed Unfair discrimination usually follows the gender stereotyping held by a society. The United Nations had concluded that women often experience a glass ceiling and that there are no societies in which women enjoy the same opportunities as men. The term glass ceiling is used to describe a perceived barrier to advancement in employment based on discrimination, especially sex discrimination. In the United States, the Glass Ceiling Commission, a government-funded group, stated: Over half of all Master's degrees are now awarded to women, yet 95% of senior-level managers, of the top Fortune 1000 industrial and 500 service companies are men. Of them, 97% are white. In its report, it recommended affirmative action, which is the consideration of an employee's gender and race in hiring and promotion decisions, as a means to end this form of discrimination.2 Transgendered individuals, both male to female and female to male, often experience problems which often lead to dismissals, underachievement, difficulty in finding a job, social isolation, and, occasionally, violent attacks against them. Legislation Flag of Australia Australia Sex Discrimination Act 1984 Flag of Canada Canada Flag of Ontario Ontario Human Rights Code 1962 Canadian Human Rights Act 1977 Flag of Hong Kong Hong Kong Sex Discrimination Ordinance 1996 Flag of Hong Kong before 1997 Flag of the United Kingdom United Kingdom Equal Pay Act 1970 - provides for equal pay for comparable work Sex Discrimination Act 1975 - makes discrimination against women or men, including discrimination on the grounds of marital status, illegal in the workplace Human Rights Act 1998 - provides more scope for redressing all forms of discriminatory imbalances Flag of the United States United States Equal Pay Act of 19634 - part of the Fair Labor Standards Act - prohibits wage discrimination by employers and labor organizations based on sex Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 19645 - broadly prohibits discrimination in the workplace including hiring, firing, workforce reduction, benefits, and sexually harassing conduct Pregnancy Discrimination Act, which amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 - covers discrimination based upon pregnancy in the workplace3 Caste discrimination According to UNICEF and Human Rights Watch, caste discrimination affects an estimated 250 million people worldwide.456 That is one in every 25 people in the world. Employment discrimination Main article: Employment discrimination The American federal laws that protect against: race, color and national origin discrimination include the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Executive Order Number 11478 among other numerous laws that protect people from race, color and national origin discrimination. sex and gender discrimination include the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Equal Pay Act of 1963. age discrimination include the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. physical and mental disability discrimination include the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 religious discriminationinclude the Civil Rights Act of 1964. military status discrimination include the Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974 An example of employment discrimination Most other western nations have similar laws protecting these groups. Language discrimination Diversity of language is protected and respected by most nations who value cultural diversity. However, people are sometimes subjected to different treatment because their preferred language is associated with a particular group, class or category. Commonly, the preferred language is just another attribute of separate ethnic groups. Discrimination exists if there is prejudicial treatment against a person or a group of people who speak a particular language or dialect. Language discrimination is suggested to be labeled Linguacism or logocism. Reverse discrimination and affirmative action Main article: Reverse discrimination Reverse discrimination is an elusive term that is used to describe policies or acts that benefit a historically economically disadvantaged group e.g. women, blacks, Hispanics, the disabled, people over 40 years of age, etc. Most academic and expert opponents of preferential policies that favor historically-discriminated groups, such as Carl Cohen, would avoid the term reverse discrimination on the grounds that discrimination is discrimination and that the label reverse is a misnomer a point that experts on both sides of the issue generally agree with. Groups such as the American Civil Rights Institute, run by Ward Connerly, have opted for the more legally precise terms race preference, gender preference, or preferential treatment generally, since these terms are contained and defined within existing civil rights law, such as the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In this vein, Ward Connerly has promoted and won a series of ballot initiatives in the states of California California Proposition 209 1996, Washington 1998 - I-200, and Michigan the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative - MCRI, or Proposal 2, 2006. California's initiative was co-authored by academics Tom Wood and Glynn Custred in the mid-1990s and was taken up by Connerly after he was appointed in 1994 by Governor Pete Wilson to the University of California Board of Regents. Each of the ballot initiatives have won, and Connerly plans what he calls a Super-Tuesday of five additional states in 2008. The language of these ballot initiatives all use the terms preferential treatment as their operative clauses. Academics such as Cohen, who was a supporter of Michigan's Proposal 2, have argued that the term affirmative action should be defined differently than race preference, and that while socio-economically based or anti-discrimination types of affirmative action should be permissible, those that give preference to individuals solely based on their race or gender should not be permitted. Cohen also helped find evidence in 1996 through the Freedom of Information Act that lead to the cases filed by Jennifer Gratz and Barbara Grutter against the University of Michigan for its undergraduate and law admissions policy - cases which were decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 23, 2003. Bloggers and internet resources against preferential types of affirmative action include John Rosenberg's Discriminations, Tim Fay's Adversity.net, and Chetly Zarko's Power, Politics, Money. Disability discrimination Main article: Ableism Please help improve this section by expanding it with: further examples of disability discrimination. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. June 2007 People with disabilities face discrimination in all levels of society. The attitude that disabled individuals are inferior to non-disabled individuals is called ableism. Chronic pain is a debilitating condition which is often neglected in modern society. According to the American Chiropractic Association, over 50% of all working US citizens complain of back pain each year. An estimated 80% of the population will experience back pain at some point in their life. Many times pain can become chronic and debilitating. Ergonomic seating and work environments are not only be a reasonable accommodation for those who suffer, they are also a preventative measure to counteract the soaring cost of medical treatment for pain conditions. Ergonomic seating in all public institutions would be a positive step to providing access to public services for all those who need it. In the United States, the Americans with Disabilities Act provides guidelines for providing wheelchair access for public institutions, but ergonomic devices for those who suffer from pain are something that has yet to be implemented. This is just one of many accessibility issues still faced by disabled individuals. Disabled people may also face discrimination by employers. They may find problems with securing employment as their handicap can be seen as a risk to the company, and once in employment they may find they are overlooked for promotion opportunities. Similarly, if an employee becomes disabled while employed they may also find themselves being managed out the company by HR departments. Unsympathetic employers can make life very difficult for such employees and can often make their health problems worse. Disability discrimination laws mean that in theory the employee has a method of redress in such instances. Theories Discriminaccion Social theories such as Egalitarianism claim that social equality should prevail. In some societies, including most developed countries, each individual's civil rights include the right to be free from government sponsored social discrimination.7 Taking into account the capacity to perceive pain and/or suffering that all animals have, 'abolitionist' or 'vegan' egalitarianism maintains that every individual, regardless their species, should have at least the basic right not to be an object.citation needed See also speciesism. Conservative and Anarcho-Capitalist In contrast, conservative writer and law professor Matthias Storme has claimed that the freedom of discrimination in human societies is a fundamental human right, or more precisely, the basis of all fundamental freedoms and therefore the most fundamental freedom. Author Hans-Hermann Hoppe, in an essay8 about his book Democracy: The God That Failed, asserts that a natural social order is characterized by increased discrimination. References ^ Callahan, Gene; Anderson, William 2001 August-September ?'. The Roots of Racial Profiling, Reason Online, Reason Foundation. Retrieved on 2006-07-27. ^ A Solid Investment: Making Full Use of the Nation's Human Capital 1995-11. Retrieved on 2008-05-23. ^ Pregnancy Discrimination Act. Retrieved on 2008-05-14. ^ Discrimination, UNICEF ^ Global Caste Discrimination ^ Caste - The Facts ^ Civil rights. Retrieved on 2006.bbb; ^ 1Hoppe, Hans-Hermann 2001. Democracy: The God That Failed. Retrieved on 2006. See also Adultism Ableism Apartheid Allport's scale Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 Atheism Classism Anti-discrimination law Eagle feather law Economic discrimination English-only movement Homophobia Institutionalized discrimination Lookism Police Brutality Heightism Racism Sexism Speciesism Anthropocentrism Second-class citizen State racism Racial segregation List of anti-discrimination acts Equal opportunity Egalitarianism Affirmative action Reverse discrimination Equal rights Social issues Intercultural competence Neurodiversity Genetic discrimination Public international law External links Transgender Workplace Diversity blog Discriminations blog Discrimination in the Czech Republic: When A Bookseller Prefers Older To Younger Project Lookism 6 Facial Discrimination Legal definitions Australia Canada Russia US Employment Discrimination Laws in the United States Discrimination Laws in Europe Retrieved from http://en..org/wiki/Discrimination Categories: DiscriminationHidden categories: Articles needing additional references from August 2008 | NPOV disputes from December 2007 | Articles with limited geographic scope | All articles with statements | Articles with statements since July 2007 | Articles with statements since May 2008 | Articles to be expanded since June 2007 | All articles to be expanded | Articles with statements since February 2008 Views Article Discussion this page History Personal tools Log in / create account Navigation Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Search Go Search Interaction Community portal Recent changes Contact Donate to Help Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link Cite this page Languages العربية БългарÑ?ки Català Česky Dansk Deutsch Español Esperanto Ù?ارسی Français 한êµì–´ Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית ქáƒ?რთული Lietuvių Magyar Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Polski Português Romani РуÑ?Ñ?кий Simple English SlovenÄ?ina SlovenÅ¡Ä?ina СрпÑ?ки / Srpski Suomi Svenska УкраїнÑ?ька West-Vlams ייִדיש 䏿–‡ This page was last modified on 28 August 2008, at 06:3
39 Reasons to Drink Acai Juice Every Day
What is MonaVie - Watch the 8-minute video
Discovering MonaVie Video
The Power of You Video
Effects of MonaVie Active on Antioxidant Capacity in Humans
Log into your Wholesale MonaVie Account
So many of us do not eat a balanced diet, get enough sleep, have too much stress, or are impacted with toxins and pollutants. Drinking 2 ounces of MonaVie twice a day will help your body detoxify as well as build your immune system. Its the smartest thing you can do for yourself, so start today. Buying MonaVie through our company guarantees you support 7 days a week and, if you would like to share MonaVie with your family and friends we will guide you from start to finish.
1. Click on Enroll Now (30 - 55% off retail price)
2. Pay $39 for your Wholesale ID number.
3. NO minimum order required.
4. MonaVie is delivered to your door in 3 to 5 days.